Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:31:01.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking Ownership: The Implementation of a Non-Aboriginal Early Education Programme for On-Reserve Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Michelle Beatch  and
Lucy Le Mare
Michelle Beatch
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Lucy Le Mare
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Get access

Abstract

In this qualitative study, over the period of one year, we assessed the appropriateness of a mainstream early childhood education intervention, the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) programme, in five on-reserve First Nations communities, by focusing on the experiences of the Aboriginal women who delivered the programme. Findings revealed a process of “taking ownership” of HIPPY. “Taking ownership” included three subprocesses: changes in the women’s views regarding (1) the strengths of the programme; (2) self-identity; and (3) the identification of the programme as Aboriginal. Through taking ownership, the women were no longer content to deliver HIPPY strictly as it was described in the programme manuals. Although the women continued to maintain that HIPPY was valuable for their communities, their actions and words clearly demonstrated that sharing cultural knowledge in the context of the programme was important to them and, they believed, important for the children and families they worked with. The process documented here points to the importance of Aboriginal culture reflected in educational provisions for Aboriginal children - whether this can be appropriately achieved through supplementing and/or adapting mainstream programmes remains a point of debate.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , 2007 , pp. 77 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, J. (2004). Early childhood care and development programs as hook and hub: Promising practices in First Nations communities. University of Victoria, School of Child and Youth Care, Early Childhood Development Intercultural Partnerships Programs.Google Scholar
BarHava-Monteith, G., Harre, N., & Field, J. (2003). An evaluation of a HIPPY early intervention program: Can parents benefit too?. In Westheimer, M. (Ed.), Parents making a difference (pp. 103–145). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Battiste, M., & Barman, J. (1995). First Nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Charters-Voght, O. (1999). Indian control of Indian education: The path of the Upper Nicola Band. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 23(1), 64–99.Google Scholar
Chung, J. (2004). Preschool literacy program piloted in Vancouver. Raven’s Eye, p.9.Google Scholar
Fournier, S., & Crey, E. (1997). Stolen from our embrace: The abduction of First Nations children and the restoration of Aboriginal communities. Vancouver, BC: Douglas & McIntyre, LTd.Google Scholar
Furniss, E. (1992). Victims of benevolence: The dark legacy of the Williams Lake Residential School. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.Google Scholar
Goulet, L., Dressyman-Lavallee, M., & McCleod, Y. (2001). Early childhood education for Aboriginal children: Opening petals. In Binda, K.P. & Calliou, S. (Eds.), Aboriginal education in Canada: A study in decolonisation (pp. 137–153). Mississauga, Ontario: Canadian Educators’ Press.Google Scholar
Haig-Brown, C. (1988). Resistance and renewal: Surviving Indian residential school. Vancouver: Tillacum Press.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kirkness, V.J. (1998). Our peoples’ education: Cut the shackles; cut the crap; cut the mustard. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22(1), 10–15.Google Scholar
Le Mare, L., & Audet, K. (2003). The Vancouver HIPPY Project: Preliminary evaluation findings from a multicultural program. In Westheimer, M. (Ed.), Parents making a difference (pp. 169–177). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Lombard, A.D. (1981). Success begins at home: Educational foundations for preschoolers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
National Indian Brotherhood (1972). Indian control of Indian education. Ottawa: Author.Google Scholar
Perley, D.G. (1993). Aboriginal education in Canada as internal colonialism. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 20(1), 118–128.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (1996). The Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Westheimer, M. (2003). Introduction: A decade of HIPPY research. In Westheimer, M. (Ed.), Parents making a difference. (pp. 19–45). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Younger, S. (2003). We talk in our family now... The stories of twelve HIPPY tutors. New Zealand: Pacific Foundation.Google Scholar