Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T15:51:33.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing an Adapted ICF Model: Aging, Vision Impairment, Activity, Participation and Subjective Dimensions of Functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Gretchen Ann Good
Gretchen Ann Good*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, United States of America, and Massey University, New Zealand
*
Wayne State University, Institute of Gerontology, 87 East Ferry Street, 255 Knapp Building, Detroit MI 48202, United States of America. E-mail: gretcheng@wayne.edu.
Get access

Abstract

An adapted model of the ICF, which incorporates subjective dimensions of functioning, has proven useful in classifying variables for research. This model was tested for its potential for further development. The following study evaluates the relationships between the components of the adapted ICF model. Five hundred and sixty surveys from adults aged 65+ from the Manawatu region of New Zealand were analyzed to test the proposed model. An adapted model of the ICF, developed in prior research exploring the impact of vision impairment on the lives of older adults, was tested. There was evidence to support the proposal that the adapted ICF model is valid and that there are moderate and strong relationships between the components. Results can influence further development of the ICF and details of this study can enhance research, practice, policy and education related to aging and human service delivery. Providers, educators and researchers should be encouraged to incorporate subjective dimensions of functioning, such as satisfaction measures, into assessments related to rehabilitation of older adults.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , January 2005 , pp. 115 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, F.M., & Withey, S.B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Barbier, O., Penta, M., & Thonnard, J. (2003). Outcome evaluation of the hand and wrist according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Hand Clinics, 19, 371–378.Google Scholar
Bilbao, A., Kennedy, C., Chatterji, S., Ustun, B., Vasquez, B., & Jeffrey, T. (2003). The ICF: Applications of the WHO model of functioning, disability and health to brain injury rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation, 18, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, M.J., Clark, M.S., Smith, D.S., & Harris, R.D. (1995). Lifestyle activities of the elderly: Composition and determinants. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, M.J., Harris, R.D., Smith, D.S., & Clark, M.S. (1992). An examination of the factor structure of the Frenchay Activities Index. Disability and Rehabilitation, 14, 27–29.Google Scholar
Bostrom, K., & Ahlstrom, G. (2004). Living with a chronic deteriorating disease: The trajectory with muscular dystrophy over ten years. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1388–1398.Google Scholar
Bowen, R., & Atwood, C. (2004). Living and dying for sex: A theory of aging based on the modulation of cell cycle signaling by reproductive hormones. Gerontology, 50, 265–290.Google Scholar
Brennan, M., & Silverstone, B. (2000). Developmental perspectives of aging and vision loss. In Silverstone, B., Lang, M.A., Rosenthal, B. & Faye, E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 409–429). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brush, J., Threats, T., & Calkins, M. (2003). Influences on perceived function of a nursing home resident. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 379–393.Google Scholar
Carod-Artal, F. J., Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J. L., Herrero, J. A. E., Horan, T., & De Seijas, E. V. (2002). Functional recovery and instrumental activities of daily living: Follow-up 1-year after treatment in a stroke unit. Brain Injury, 16, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, T.J., (1961). Blindness: What it is, what it does, and how to live with it. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairfax, J. (2002). Theory of quality of life of stroke survivors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MIGoogle Scholar
Garcia, P., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Measuring health. A step in the development of city health profiles. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Gluckman, A., & Tagg, M. (1995). Ageing is attitude: The New Zealand experience. Auckland: Tandem Press.Google Scholar
Good, G.A. (1999, 07). Independent living skills of older individuals: A review of assessment instruments. Poster presented at the Rehabilitation Teaching: The Next Century Conference, Kalamazoo, MI.Google Scholar
Good, G.A. (2001). Ageing, vision loss and quality of life: Are we asking the right questions? In La Grow, S.J. (Ed.), New Zealand Rehabilitation Association 2001 Conference (pp. 21–26). Wellington: NZRA.Google Scholar
Good, G.A. (2005). Ageing and vision loss: Activity, independence and life satisfaction. Unpublished PhD, School of Health Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Haley, J.A.M., & Kooyoomjian, J.T. (2003). Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 3, 145–149.Google Scholar
Headey, B.W., Kelley, J., & Wearing, A.J. (1993). Dimensions of mental health: Life satisfaction, positive affect, anxiety and depression. Social Indicators Research, 29(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, B., & Hoek, J. (2000). Using the web to predict elections. Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
Hemmingsson, H., & Jonsson, H. (2005). An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health — some critical remarks. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 569–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C.E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, C.L., & Hsueh, I.P. (1999). A cross-validation of the comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31, 83–88.Google Scholar
Kempen, G., Steverink, N., Ormel, J., & Deeg, D.J.H. (1996). The assessment of ADL among frail elderly in an interview survey: Self-report versus performance-based tests and determinants of discrepancies. Journals of Gerontology, 51B, 254–260.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (2003). Functioning and disability associated with mental disorders: The evolution since ICIDH. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 611–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, B.E.K., Klein, R., Lee, K.E., & Cruickshanks, K.J. (1999). Associations of performance-based and self-reported measures of visual function. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 6, 49–60.Google Scholar
Lysack, C. (2006) Environmental influences on the community participation and integration of persons with spinal cord injury. Wayne State University, Institute of Gerontology, Colloquium Series. Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
Matcha, D.A. (1997) The sociology of aging: A social problems perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Moller, K. (2003). Deafblindness: A challenge for assessment: Is the ICF a useful tool? International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl. 1), S140–142.Google Scholar
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perenboom, R.J.M., & Chorus, A.M.J. (2003). Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 577–587.Google Scholar
Rentsch, H.P., Bucher, P., Nyffeler, I., Dommen Wolf, C., Hefti, H., Fluri, E., et al. (2003). The implementation of the ‘International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health’ (ICF) in daily practice neurorehabilitation: An interdisciplinary project at the Kantonsspital of Lucerne, Switzerland. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 411–421.Google Scholar
Rogers, P., Menchetti, B., & Lai, S.-C. (2000). Using existing databases to evaluate rehabilitation outcomes of older persons who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarason, I G., Sarason, B.R., Shearin, E.N., & Pierce, G.R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 497–510.Google Scholar
Schneidert, M., Hurst, R., Miller, J., & Üstün, B. (2003). The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 588–595.Google Scholar
Siegert, R.J., Patten, D.M., & Walkey, F.H. (1987). Development of a brief social support questionnaire. New Zealand Journal of Psychology (16), 79–83.Google Scholar
Statistics New Zealand. (1996). New Zealand census of population and dwellings. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
Statistics New Zealand. (2001b). New Zealand census of population and dwellings. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
Stephens, D., Vetter, N., & Lewis, P. (2003). Investigating lifestyle factors affecting hearing aid candidature in the elderly. International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl. 2), 2S33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stucki, G., & Sigl, T. (2003). Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 17(3), 451–473Google Scholar
Ueda, S., & Okawa, Y. (2003). The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 596–601.Google Scholar
Waddell, G. (2002). Models of disability: Using low back pain as an example. London: Royal Society of Medicine.Google Scholar
Weigl, M., Cieza, A., Harder, M., Geyh, S., Amann, E., Kostanjsek, N., et al. (2003). Linking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Osteoarthritis & Cartilage, 11, 519–523.Google Scholar
Whitbourne, S.K. (1996). The aging individual: Physical and psychological perspectives. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: Author.Google Scholar