Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:37:28.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Habsburg Army and the Nationality Problem in the Nineteenth Century, 1815–19141

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Gunther E. Rothenberg
Gunther E. Rothenberg
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians are generally agreed that until the very end of the Habsburg monarchy the army constituted one of the main pillars of the multinational empire.2 Even so, the view that the armed might was always a reliable instrument of the established order and that it was largely unaffected by the nationality problem cannot be accepted. On the contrary, throughout the period from 1815 to 1914 the nationality problem was constantly present in the army. On occasion, as in 1848–49, it actually divided the army against itself; at other times it corroded the loyalty of some contingents, and it often influenced political, administrative, strategic, and even tactical decisions. After 1867 the status of the Hungarian forces within the Dual Monarchy became one of the most crucial, and at the same time one of the most vexing, problems of the empire.

Type
The Centripetal Forces in the Monarchy
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 1967 , pp. 70 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 See, for example, Jászi, Oscar, The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy (Chicago, III.: University of Chicago Press, 1929), pp. 141–143Google Scholar; May, Arthur J., The Hapsburg Monarchy, 1867–1914 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951), pp. 490–491Google Scholar; and Zeman, Z. A. B., The Break-up of the Habsburg Empire, 1914–1918 (London: Oxford University Press, 1961), p. 39Google Scholar.

3 Zimmermann, Jürg, Militärverwaltung und Heeresaufbringung in Osterreich bis 1806. Vol. III of Handbuch zur Deutschen Militärgeschichte 1648–1939 (Frankfurt a. M.: Bernard & Graefe Verlag, 1965), pp. 108–114Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., pp. 121–126.

5 For the composition of the officer corps, see von Preradovich, Nikolaus, Die Führungsschichten in Österreich und Preussen (1804–1918) mit einem Ausblick zum Jahre 1945 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1955), pp. 43–44Google Scholar. On the enlisted men, see von Mollinary, Anton Freiherr, Sechsundvierzig Jahre im österreich-ungarischen Heere 1833–1879 (2 vols., Zürich: Orell Füssli, 1905), Vol. I, p. 33Google Scholar.

6 Miskolczy, Julius, Ungarn in der Habsburger-Monarchie (Vienna: Herold Verlag, 1959), pp. 48–49 and 81–82Google Scholar.

7 Kiszling, Rudolf, “Das Nationalitätenproblem in Habsburgs Wehrmacht 1848–1918,” Der Donauraum, Vol. IV (1959), pp. 82–83Google Scholar.

8 Rothenberg, Gunther E., The Military Border in Croatia, 1740–1881 (Chicago, III.: University of Chicago Press, 1966), pp. 140–142Google Scholar.

9 Compiled from Militär-Schematismus des österreichischen Kaiserthums (Vienna: k. k. Hof- und Staats-Druckerei, 1847)Google Scholar.

10 Archduke Albrecht to Generaladjutant Count Crenneville, November 5, 1862, von Srbik, Heinrich, Aus Österreichs Vergangenheit (Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag, 1949), p. 139Google Scholar.

11 Craig, Gordon A., “Command and Staff Problems in the Austrian Army, 1740–1866,” in Michael, Howard (ed.), The Theory and Practice of War (New York: Praeger, 1965), p. 54Google Scholar.

12 von Angeli, Col. Moriz Edler, Wien nach 1848 (Vienna: Braumüller, 1905), pp. 14–16Google Scholar.

13 Gürtler, Ilse, Die Auflösung der siebenbiirgischen Militärgrenze (Unpublished dissertation, University of Vienna, 1947)Google Scholar.

14 Decree, September 13, 1849, as cited. in von Kahlig, E. and R. Ritter von Jedina, Österreich-Ungarn: Das Heer—Die Flotte (Berlin: Alfred Schall, 1898), p. 31Google Scholar.

15 Angeli, Wien nach 1848, pp. 59–61.

16 Rothenberg, The Military Border in Croatia, p. 160.

17 Friedjung, Heinrich, Der Kampf um die Vorherrschaft in Deutschland 1859 bis 1866 (2 vols., Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta'sche Buchhandlung Nachfolger, 1916), Vol. I, p. 31Google Scholar. See also the literature cited in Regele, Oskar, Feldzeugmeister Benedek. Der Weg nach Königgrätz (Vienna: Herold Verlag, 1960), p. 123Google Scholar.

18 Delbrück, Hans, et al. , Geschichte der Kriegskunst im Rahmen der politischen Geschichte (7 vols., Berlin: Verlag Georg Stilke, 1900–1937), Vol. V, pp. 229–230, 342, and 425–428Google Scholar. This view is disputed in Srbik, Österreichs Vergangenheit, pp. 130–131. See also Craig, “Command and Staff Problems in the Austrian Army, 1740–1866,” p. 62.

19 On the Hungarian desertions in 1859, see Gründorf von Zebégeny, Wilhelm Ritter, Memoiren eines österreichischen Generalstäblers 1882–1866 (Stuttgart: Verlag Robert Lutz, 1913), pp. 144–145Google Scholar. On the with-drawal of the Clam-Gallas Corps, see Friedjung, , Kampf um die Vorherrschaft in Deutschland, Vol. I, pp. 31–32Google Scholar. On the Grenzer, see Rothenherg, The Military Border in Croatia, pp. 161–163.

20 Statement made by Lt. Col. Bartels von Bartberg, as cited in Rothenberg, The Military Border in Croatia, pp. 161–163.

21 See the literature cited in ibid., pp. 166–167; and Kirkpatrick, Harold L., Bismarck's Insurrectionist Projects during the Austro-Prussian War, 1866 (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California [Berkeley], 1962)Google Scholar.

22 Craig, Gordon A., The Battle of Königgrätz. Prussia's Victory over Austria (Philadelphia, Pa.: J. B. Lippincott, 1964), p. 7Google Scholar.

23 von Wertheimer, Eduard, Graf Julius Andrássy: sein Leben und seine Zeit (3 vols., Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1913), Vol. I, p. 250Google Scholar.

24 For the struggle over the status of the Hungarian forces in general, see von Glaise-Horstenau, Edmund, Franz Josephs Weggefährte: das Leben des Generalstabschef Beck (Vienna: Amalthea Verlag, 1930), pp. 137–152Google Scholar. Albrecht's, position was expressed in the anonymous pamphlet Wie soil Oesterreichs Heer organisiert sein? (Vienna: Tendler & Co., 1868), pp. 19–20 and 42–44Google Scholar.

25 Glaise-Horstenau, Das Leben des Generalstabschef Beck, pp. 151–152; Wertheimer, , Andrássy, Vol. I, pp. 363–367Google Scholar.

26 Miskolczy, Ungarn in der Habsburger-Monarchie, p. 162.

27 Srbik, Österreichs Vergangenheit, pp. 183–184.

28 von Sosnosky, Theodor, Die Politik im Habsburgerreiche (2 vols., Berlin: Hermann Paetel Verlag, 1912), Vol. II, pp. 167–170Google Scholar.

29 Rothenberg, The Military Border in Croatia, p. 176; Srbik, Österreichs Vergangenheit, p. 91. On the decision to occupy Bosnia-Herzegovina, see von Sosnosky, Theodor, Die Balkanpolitik Oesterreich-Ungarns seit 1866 (2 vols., Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1913), Vol. I, pp. 125–192Google Scholar.

30 Preradovich, Die Führungsschichten in Österreich und Preussen, pp. 43–45; Jászi, The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy, pp. 142–143.

31 On the status of the reserve officers, see Jedlicka, Ludwig, Ein Heer im Schatten der Parteien (Graz: Verlag Hermann Böhlaus Nachf., 1955), pp. 5–6Google Scholar. For Conrad's views on the reserve officers, see von Hötzendorf, Franz Conrad, Aus meiner Dienstzeit 1906–1918 (5 vols., Vienna: Rikola Verlag, 1921–1925), Vol. I, p. 329Google Scholar. Of course, only national groups with a large middle class could provide substantial numbers of reserve officers, and Germans, Magyars, and Czechs predominated. See Stone, Norman, “Army and Society in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1900–1914,” Past & Present, No. 33 (April, 1966), p. 99Google Scholar.

32 Regele, Oskar, Feldmarschall Conrad (Vienna: Herold Verlag, 1955), pp. 83–85Google Scholar.

33 Cited in May, The Hapsburg Monarchy, p. 491.

34 Schwarzenberg, Karl, Kann sich die österreichisch-ungarische Armee den Einflüssen der Nationalitätenkämpfe entziehen? (Munich: J. F. Lehmann, 1898), pp. 9–22Google Scholar; Vagts, Alfred, A History of Militarism (New York: Norton, 1937), p. 273Google Scholar.

35 Sosnosky, , Die Politik im Habsburgerreiche, Vol. II, pp. 167–171Google Scholar.

36 Jenks, William A., Austria under the Iron Ring, 1879–1898 (Charlottesville, Va.: University of Virginia Press, 1965), pp. 245–246Google Scholar.

37 Hickmann, A. W., Die Nationalitätenverhältnisse im Mannschaftsstande der k. u. k. gemeinsamen Armee (Vienna: Freytag & Berndt, 1911), passimGoogle Scholar.

38 Kiszling, Rudolf, Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand von Österreich-Este (Graz: Hermann Böhlaus Nachf., 1953), pp. 76–79Google Scholar.

39 Glaise-Horstenau, Das Leben des Generalstabschef Beck, p. 406.

40 Sosnosky, , Die Politik im Habsburgerreiche, Vol. II, pp. 195–197Google Scholar.

41 Kiszling, Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand, pp. 78–79.

42 Austria, , Bundesministerium für Landesverteidigung, Österreich-Ungarns letzter Krieg 1914–1918 (7 vols., Vienna: Verlag der Militärwissenschaftlichen Mitteilungen, 1930–1938), Vol. I, pp. 27–29Google Scholar.

43 Kiszling, “Das Nationalitätenproblem in Habsburgs Wehrmacht,” p. 88; Schwarzenberg, Kann sich die österreichisch-ungarische Armee den Einflüssen der Nationalitätenkämpfe entziehen?, p. 18.

44 Conrad, , Aus meiner Dienstzeit, Vol. I, p. 333Google Scholar.

45 Kiszling, “Das Nationalitätenproblem in Habsburgs Wehrmacht,” p. 88.

46 Cited in Vagts, History of Militarism, p. 273.

47 Regele, Feldmarschall Conrad, pp. 145–188. According to Regele, “Ten years of political obstruction in parliament had caused the monarchy to miss the moment for an effective increase in armaments.” Ibid., p. 188. See also Veltzé, Alois, Internationaler Armee-Almanach 1913 (Vienna: A. Edlinger, 1913), passimGoogle Scholar.

48 Ropp, Theodore, War in the Modern World (Durham, N. C: Duke University Press, 1959), p. 226Google Scholar.

49 Zeman, The Break-up of the Habsburg Empire, pp. 51–56. See also the detailed discussion in Plaschka, Richard, “Zur Vorgeschichte des Überganges von Einheiten des Infanterieregimentes Nr. 28 an der russischen Front 1915,” in Heinrich, Fichtenau (ed.), Österreich und Europa. Festgabe für Hugo Hantsch (Graz: Styria, 1965), pp. 455–464Google Scholar.

50 Zeman, The Break-up of the Habsburg Empire, p. 251 and passim.

51 Falls, Cyril, The Battle of Caporetto (Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott, 1966), p. 137Google Scholar.

52 Zeman, The Break-up of the Habsburg Empire, pp. 162–163. See also the literature cited in Koči, Josef and Kořalka, Jiří, “The History of the Habsburg Monarchy (1526–1918) in Czechoslovak Historiography since 1945,” Austrian History Yearbook, Vol. II (1965), pp. 221–222Google Scholar.

53 Zeman, The Break-up of the Habsburg Empire, p. 39.

54 Taylor, A. J. P.. The Habsburg Monarchy 1815–1918 (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), p. 229Google Scholar.