Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-23T04:14:40.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bindra's theory from the perspective of human motivation: unit size, stimulus centering, and the value of neural theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

T. A. Ryan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, J. W., An introduction to motivation. Princeton, N.J., D. Van Nostrand Co. 1964.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O.The Organization of Behavior. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1949.Google Scholar
Lewin, K.Field theory in social science. N.Y. Harper, 1951.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C, Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., and Lowell, E. L., The achievement motive. N.Y., Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, T. A.Intentional Behavior: An Approach to Human Motivation. Ronald Press Co., New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Weiner, B.Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition. Chicago, Markham Publishing Co., 1972.Google Scholar