No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Distinguishing between acts and patterns
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
The costliness of disrupting a pattern may not be a useful criterion for distinguishing between acts and patterns; there are instances in which omitted components of patterns are hard to detect (e.g., typographical errors), or in which distortions are easily introduced (e.g., slurred words in a trite phrase). Are there behavioral criteria for distinguishing between acts and patterns?
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995