Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:08:20.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Has the brain evolved to answer “binding questions” or to generate likely hypotheses about complex and continuously changing environments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2006

Birgitta Dresp  and
Jean Charles Barthaud
Birgitta Dresp
Affiliation:
CNRS, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, FranceBirgitta.Dresp@univ-lyon2.fr
Jean Charles Barthaud
Affiliation:
Laboratoire “Etudes des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC),” Université de Lyon 2, Campus Porte des Alpes, 69676 Bron Cedex, Francejean-charles.barthaud@univ-lyon2.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We question the ecological plausibility as a general model of cognition of van der Velde's & de Kamps's combinatorial blackboard architecture, where knowledge-binding in space and time relies on the structural rules of language. Evidence against their view of the brain and an ecologically plausible, alternative model of cognition are brought forward.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 75 - 76
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)