Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Kraemer, Helena Chmura
1991.
Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
152.
Eckberg, Douglas Lee
1991.
When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
145.
Hargens, Lowell L.
1991.
Referee agreement in context.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
150.
Cone, John D.
1991.
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.
Crandall, Rick
1991.
What should be done improve reviewing?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
143.
Rosenthal, Robert
1991.
Some indices of the reliability of peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
160.
Tyrer, Peter
1991.
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
164.
Armstrong, J. Scott
and
Hubbard, Raymond
1991.
Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
136.
Schönemann, Peter H.
1991.
In praise of randomness.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
162.
Lock, Stephen P.
1991.
Should the blinded lead the blinded?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
156.
Bornstein, Robert F.
1991.
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
138.
Demorest, Marilyn E.
1991.
Different rates of agreement on acceptance and rejection: A statistical artifact?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
144.
Fuller, Steve
1991.
Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
147.
Roediger, Henry L.
1991.
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
159.
Wasserman, Gerald S.
1991.
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
165.
Bailar, John C.
1991.
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Cole, Stephen
1991.
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Fletcher, Jack M.
1991.
Journal availability and the quality of published research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
146.
Nelson, Linda D.
1991.
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
158.
Zentall, Thomas R.
1991.
What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
166.