Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T21:21:42.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relational learning re-examined

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

Chris Thornton
Affiliation:
Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, United Kingdomchris.thornton@cogs.Sussex.ac.uk
Andy Clark
Affiliation:
Philosophy/Neuroscience/Psychology Program, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 andy@twinearth.wustl.edu

Abstract

We argue that existing learning algorithms are often poorly equipped to solve problems involving a certain type of important and widespread regularity that we call “type-2 regularity.” The solution in these cases is to trade achieved representation against computational search. We investigate several ways in which such a trade-off may be pursued including simple incremental learning, modular connectionism, and the developmental hypothesis of “representational redescription.”

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)