Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T13:26:06.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Episodic memory is as much about communicating as it is about relating to others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2018

Alin Coman
Alin Coman*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology & Woodrow Wilson School for Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544. acoman@princeton.eduhttps://www.princeton.edu/~acoman/Home.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mahr & Csibra (M&C) provide extensive evidence for the communicative function of episodic memory, suggesting that the malleability of human memory is in large part due to its communicative dimension. I argue that emphasizing the relational motivations involved in communication provides a more proximal explanation for why our memories are as malleable.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e7
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coman, A. (2015) The psychology of collective memory. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, vol. 4, 2nd edition, ed. Wright, J. D., pp. 188–93. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Coman, A. & Hirst, W. (2012) Cognition through a social network: The propagation of induced forgetting and practice effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141:321–36.Google Scholar
Coman, A. & Hirst, W. (2015) Relational motives and socially shared retrieval induced forgetting: The role of social group membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144:717–22.Google Scholar
Cuc, A., Koppel, J. & Hirst, W. (2007) Silence is not golden: A case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science 18:727–33.Google Scholar
Fivush, R. (2010a) The development of autobiographical memory. Annual Review of Psychology 62(2):2–24.Google Scholar
Hardin, C. D. & Higgins, E. T. (1996) Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In: Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context, vol. 3, ed. Sorrentino, R. M. & Higgins, E. T, pp. 28–84. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Harris, F. C. (2006) It takes a tragedy to arouse them: Collective memory and collective action during the civil rights movement. Social Movement Studies 5(1):19–43.Google Scholar
Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y. & Takezawa, M. (1997) Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(2):296–309.Google Scholar
Koppel, J., Wohl, D., Meksin, R. & Hirst, W. (2014) The effects of listening to others remember on subsequent memory: The role of expertise and trust in socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Social Cognition 32:148–80.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (2001) The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Stone, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J. & Hirst, W. (2010) Building consensus about the past: Schema consistency and convergence in socially-shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory 18:170–84.Google Scholar