Article contents
The heuristic value of controversy in science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2007
Abstract
Ceci et al.'s (2006) findings remind us that tenure rarely serves its intended purpose. I argue that tenure often fails in part because many faculty members possess an insufficient appreciation for the heuristic value of controversy in science and other disciplines. Using two case examples from clinical/personality psychology, I show how controversial positions can draw sharp criticism while facilitating scientific progress.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
- 2
- Cited by