Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T20:53:43.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A mass assembly of associative mechanisms: A dynamical systems account of natural social interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Nicholas D. Duran ,
Rick Dale  and
Daniel C. Richardson
Nicholas D. Duran
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85069-7100. nicholas.duran@asu.eduhttp://dynamicog.org
Rick Dale
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, Cognitive & Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343. rdale@ucmerced.eduhttp://cognaction.org
Daniel C. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. dcr@eyethink.orghttp://eyethink.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article offers a negative, eliminativist thesis, dissolving the specialness of mirroring processes into a solution of associative mechanisms. We support the authors' project enthusiastically. What they are currently missing, we argue, is a positive, generative thesis about associative learning mechanisms and how they might give way to the complex, multimodal coordination that naturally arises in social interaction.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N. D. & Richardson, D. C. (2013) The self-organization of human interaction. In: Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 59, ed. Ross, B., pp. 43–95. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dale, R., Kirkham, N. Z. & Richardson, D. C. (2011) The dynamics of reference and shared visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology 2:1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duran, N. D., Fusaroli, R. & Dale, R. (in preparation) Coordination dynamics during deception. Manuscript in preparation, UC Merced, CA.Google Scholar
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G. & Jeuniaux, P. (2012) Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science 36:1404–26.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R. & Kirkham, N. (2007) The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science 18:407–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R. & Shockley, K. (2008) Synchrony and swing in conversation: Coordination, temporal dynamics and communication. In: Embodied communication, ed. Wachsmuth, I., Lenzen, M., & Knoblich, G., pp. 75–93. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. J., Dale, R. & Marsh, K. (2014) Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology: Theory, modeling and analysis. In: Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, ed. Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M., pp. 253–82. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C. & Turvey, M. T. (1990) Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16:227–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Shockley, K., Santana, M. & Fowler, C. A. (2003) Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29:326–32.Google ScholarPubMed