Article contents
Neural plausibility and validation may not be so E-Z
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2004
Abstract:
Although the E-Z Reader model accounts well for eye-tracking data, it will be judged by new predictions and consistency with evidence from brain imaging methodologies. The stage architecture proposed for lexical access seems somewhat arbitrary and calculated timings are conservatively slow. There are certain effects in the literature that seem incompatible with the model.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003
- 2
- Cited by