Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:12:44.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The preservation of academic freedom: Tenure is not enough

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2007

Elizabeth A. Franz  and
Harlene Hayne
Elizabeth A. Franz*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/franz.html http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/hayne.html
Harlene Hayne*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/franz.html http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/hayne.html
*
5269lfranz@psy.otago.ac.nz
hayne@psy.otago.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The original purpose of tenure has become clouded by the process by which it is granted. In New Zealand, tenure and academic freedom are separate, with academic freedom protected by legislation. Clearly, tenure is neither necessary nor sufficient to protect academic freedom. Individuals and universities must do more to guard academic freedom in order to encourage, nurture, and protect it.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 576 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)