Article contents
Three fallacies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2001
Abstract
Three fallacies in the rationality debate obscure the possibility for reconciling the opposed camps. I focus on how these fallacies arise in the view that subjects interpret their task differently from the experimenters (owing to the influence of conversational expectations). The themes are: first, critical assessment must start from subjects' understanding; second, a modal fallacy; and third, fallacies of distribution.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2000 Cambridge University Press
- 3
- Cited by