Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T22:24:43.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is embodied: “A-not-B error” or delayed-response learning?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

George F. Michel
George F. Michel
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, DePaul University Chicago, IL 60614–3504 gmichel@condor.depaul.edu www.depaul.edu/~gmichel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The procedures used to ensure reliable occurrences of the A-not-B error distort and miss essential features of Piaget's original observations. A model that meshes a mental event, highly restricted by testing procedures, to the dynamics of bodily movement is of limited value. To embody more than just perseverative reaching, the formal model must incorporate Piaget's essential features.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 54 - 55
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)