Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T04:28:46.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Involving Parents in Improving Children's Learning at School: Policy Issues for Behavioural Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Ted Glynn
Affiliation:
Education Department, University of Otago
Rachel Fairweather
Affiliation:
Education Department, University of Otago
Steven Donald
Affiliation:
Education Department, University of Otago
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines some of the policy issues arising from behavioural approaches to involving parents in improving their children's learning at school. Issues raised include (a) the researcher's role in establishing equitable partnerships between parents and teachers, (b) reducing educational inequalities, and (c) designing research to examine generalisation of children's learning across home and school settings, and the effects of implementing components of intervention at home and at school. The paper discusses particular challenges for applied behavioural research presented by each of these issues.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bishop, R., & Glynn, T. (1992). He kanohi kitea: Conducting and evaluating educational research. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 27 {2).Google Scholar
Blackstone, T. (1979). Parental involvement in education. Educational Policy Bulletin, 7(1), 8198.Google Scholar
Clarke-Stewart, K. (1988). Parents' effects on children's development: A decade of progress? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 9, 4184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadds, M., Schwartz, S., & Sanders, M. (1987). Marital discord and treatment outcome in behavioral treatment of child conduct disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 396403.Google Scholar
Glynn, T. (1985). Contexts for independent learning. Educational Psychology, 5(1), 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, T. (1987). More power to the parents: Behavioural approaches to remedial tutoring at home. In Wheldall, K. (Ed.), The behaviourist in the classroom (2nd ed. rev.). London: Allen & Unwin in association with Positive Products.Google Scholar
Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Ballard, K., Bethune, N., & Smith, J. (1992). Reading recovery in context: Report to the New Zealand Department of Education. Dunedin: University of Otago Education Department.Google Scholar
Glynn, T., & Glynn, V., (1986). Shared reading by Cambodian mothers and children learning English as a second language: Reciprocal gains. The Exceptional Child, 33(3), 159172.Google Scholar
Glynn, T., & McNaughton, S. (1985). The Mangere home and school remedial reading procedures: Continuing research on their effectiveness. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 6677.Google Scholar
Glynn, T., McNaughton, S., Robinson, V., & Quinn, M. (1979). Remedial reading at home: Helping you to help your child. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, C. (1989). Parents' effects on academic grouping for reading: Three case studies. American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 329352.Google Scholar
Hohepa, M. (1991). Te kohanga reo hei tikanga ako i te reo Maori (Te kohanga reo as a context for language learning). Unpublished master's thesis, Education Department, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Ka'ai, T. (1990). Te hiringa taketake: Mai i te kohanga reo ki te kura. Unpublished master's thesis in Education Department, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S., Glynn, T., & Robinson, V. (1987). Pause, Prompt and Praise: Effective remedial reading tutoring. Birmingham: Positive Products.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, L., Jouriles, E., Brown, M., Etscheidt, M., & Kelly, K. (1990). Effects of problem-solving therapy on outcomes of parent training for single parent families. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 72(1), 111.Google Scholar
Pugh, G. (1987). Portage in perspective: Parental involvement in pre-school programmes. In Hedderty, R. & Jennings, K. (Eds.), Extending and developing portage. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Scott, J., & Ballard, K. (1983). Training parents and teachers in remedial reading procedures for children with learning difficulties. Educational Psychology, 3(1), 1530.Google Scholar
Tangaere, A. (1992). Te puawaitanga o te reo ka hua te ha o te potiki i roto i te whanau ko tenei te tahuhu o te kohanga reo (Language transference from Te Kohanga Reo to home: The roles of the child and the family). Unpublished master's thesis, Education Department, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Toomey, D. (1989). How home-school relations policies can increase educational inequality: A three-year follow-up. Australian Journal of Education, 33(3), 284298.Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, C., Hollinsworth, T., & Kolpacoff, M. (1989). The long-term effectiveness and clinical significance of three cost-effective training programmes for families with conduct-problem children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(4), 550553.Google Scholar
Woods, S. (1988). Parents: Whose partners? In Barton, L. (Ed.), The politics of special education needs (pp. 190207). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar