Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:35:10.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convicted of Our Relevance: An Introduction to the Special Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Neville M. Blampied
Neville M. Blampied*
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury Christchurch, NZ
*
Psychology Department, University of Canterbury, PB 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
Get access

Extract

      “I'd warned her that intellectuals didn't count for much in the scheme of things: but academics are like the clergy in their blind conviction that their vocation has relevance to the rest of the world.” (McCauley, 1990).

In the beginning, the founders of behaviour therapy were quite explicit about the link between basic laboratory research and their new therapies (Eysenck, 1960; Wolpe, 1958). Their claim that behaviour therapy was based on “modern learning theory” was not, however, without controversy (e.g., Breger & McGaugh, 1965; London, 1972); but while the logical necessity for appeal to laboratory research on learning might have been questioned (Breger & McGaugh, 1965), the historical contingencies linking Pavlov's dogs, Masserman's cats, and Wolpe's first systematic desensitisation patients can scarcely be questioned (American Psychological Association, 1980; Kazdin, 1978).

It is equally clear that there was a similar close historical link between laboratory studies of operant behaviour, especially by Skinner and his students, and the development of behaviour modification applications such as reinforcement therapy and the token economy (Kazdin, 1978; Krasner 1971; Skinner, 1953). Again, the continuing necessity for behaviour modification to be linked to basic research in operant behaviour has been challenged (Azrin, 1977; cf. Deitz, 1978) but the historic fact of the relationship is well established (Krasner, 1971).

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 10 , Issue 3: Special Issue: The Relevance of Basic Research to Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy , September 1993 , pp. 115 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychological Association. (1980). Distinguished scientific award for the applications of psychology: 1979. American Psychologist, 35, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azrin, N.H. (1977). A strategy for applied research: Learning based but outcome oriented. American Psychologist, 32, 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behaviour analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breger, L., & McGaugh, J.L. (1965). Critique and reformulation of “learning theory” approaches to psychotherapy and neurosis. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 338–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davey, C.L. (1993). Trauma revaluation, conditioning, and anxiety disorders. Behaviour Change, 10, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, M. (1992). Applied quantitative behavior analysis: A view from the laboratory. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitz, S.M. (1978). Current status of applied behavior analysis: Science vs technology. American Psychologist, 33, 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, B.A. (1989). Generalisation: Terminological, methodological and conceptual issues. Behavior Therapy, 20, 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. (1960). Behaviour therapy and the neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R.J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrnstein, R.J. (1971). Quantitative hedonism. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 8, 399–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, P.J., & Lowe, C.F. (1993). Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 29–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J.M. (1979). On the relation between generalisation and generality. The Behavior Analyst, 2, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (1978). History of behavior modification: Experimental foundations of contemporary research. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, L. (1971). Behavior therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 22, 483–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levis, D.J. (1991). A clinician's plea for a return to the development of nonhuman models of psychopathology: New clinical observations in need of laboratory study. In Denny, M.R. (Ed.), Fear, avoidance & phobias: A fundamental analysis (pp. 395–427). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Levis, D.J. (1993). The power of extrapolating basic laboratory principles: The behavioural-cognitive approach of implosive therapy. Behaviour Change, 10, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levis, D.J., & Malloy, P.F. (1982). Research in infrahuman and human conditioning. In Wilson, G.T. & Franks, C.M. (Eds.), Contemporary behavior therapy: Conceptual & empirical foundations (pp. 65–118). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Loftus, E.F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovibond, P.F. (1993). Conditioning and cognitive-behaviour therapy. Behaviour Change, 10, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, P. (1972). The end of ideology in behaviour modification. American Psychologist, 27, 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C. (1993). Cognition in clinical psychology: Measures, methods or models. Behaviour Change, 10, 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, B.K. (1992). Contingency and choice: The implications of matching theory for classroom instruction. Journal of Behavioural Education, 2, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S. (1990). Bad music. Auckland, NZ: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
McDowell, J.J. (1982). The importance of Hermstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. American Psychologist, 37, 771–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, J. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, J.R., & Woods, D.J. (1980). Persistence: The role of partial reinforcement in psychotherapy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 175–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Nevin, J.A. (1988). Behavioural momentum and the partial reinforcement effect. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevin, J.A. (1993). Behavioral momentum: Implications for clinical practice. Behaviour Change, 10, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, W.D., & Epling, W.F. (1980). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, R.A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A.O. (1985). To form a more perfect union: It is time to stop standing still. Behavior Therapy, 16, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stampfl, T.G., & Levis, D.J. (1967). The essentials of implosive therapy: A learning theory based on psychodynamic behavioural therapy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, T.F., & Baer, D.M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalisation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strongman, K.T. (1993). Emotion theory and cognitive-behaviour therapy. Behaviour Change, 10, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P.H., Spence, S.H., & Kavanagh, D.J. (1989). Cognitive behavioural interviewing for adult disorders: A practical handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar