Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T00:29:13.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Instructions and Reinforcement on the Handwriting of a 13-Year-Old Child in a Remedial School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

John F. Masterson ,
Helen Earls  and
Deidre Taylor
John F. Masterson
Affiliation:
School of Remedial Linguistics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Helen Earls
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University College, Galway, Ireland.
Deidre Taylor
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University College, Galway, Ireland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effects of instructions and reinforcement on the handwriting of a 13-year-old boy in special education were studied. Both variables were found to be effective. A simple scoring method was used. It was found that the scoring system was easily learned by the child, and was sufficiently reliable to merit continued use under certain circumstances.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 167 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brigham, T. A., Finfrock, S. R. and Bushell, D. Jr. (1972). The use of programmed materials in the analysis of academic contingencies. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 5, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felixbrod, J. J. and O'Leary, K. D. (1973). Effects of reinforcement on children's academic behaviour as a function of self-determination and externally imposed contingencies. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 6, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helwig, J. J., Johns, J. C., Norman, J. E. and Cooper, J. D. (1976). The measurement of manuscript letter strokes. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 9, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, B. L., Schutte, R. C. and Garton, K. L. (1971). The effects of access to a playroom on the rate and quality of printing and writing of first and second grade students. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 4, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns, J. C., Trap, J. and Cooper, J. D. (1977). Technical Report: Students self recording of manuscript letter strokes. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 10, 509–514.Google Scholar
Miller, L. K. and Schneider, R. (1970). The use of a token system in project Head Start. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 3, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapport, M. D. and Bostow, D. E. (1976). The effects of access to special activities on performance in four categories of academic tasks with third grade students. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 9, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzberg, B. H., Wheeler, A. J., Devar, L. T. and Hopkins, B. L. (1971). The effect of intermittent feedback contingent access to play on kindergarden children. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 4, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trap, J. J., Milner-Davis, P., Joseph, S. and Cooper, J. D. (1978). The effects of feedback and consequences on transitional cursive letter formation. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 11, 381–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vere Foster Copy Book. No. 2. Blackie & Son, Ltd.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, E. H., Zimmerman, J. and Russell, C. D. (1969). Differential effects of token reinforcement on instruction—following behaviour in retarded students instructed as a group. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 2, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.