Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T04:29:06.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Functional Performance Record—An Observational Procedure for use with Disabled People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

David J. Mulhall
David J. Mulhall
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Whitchurch Hosptial, Cardiff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Functional Performance Record (FPR) identifies and provides a means of recording the actions, behaviour and functioning of those whose independence is reduced either permanently or for prolonged periods by physical or mental or psychiatric disabilities. It is for use in goal setting, evaluating outcomes, monitoring standards of care, service planning and research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 69 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burton, M., Thomas, M. and Cullen, C. (1981). Offerton self-care checklist. Hester Adrian Research Centre. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, C., Burton, M., Thomas, M. and Watts, S. (1983). Residents development project. Final report to the DHSS. Hester Adrian Research Centre. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
D.H.S.S., (1981). Care in the Community.Google Scholar
Dobson, C. (1982). The nursing process and mental handicap. Mental Handicap 10, 64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houts, P. S. and Scott, R. A. (1975). Goal planning with developmentally disabled persons. Procedures for developing an individualized client plan. Department of Behavioural Science, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. The Milton S. Hersley Medical Centre, Hersley, Pennsylvania 17033.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. M. and Marks-Moran, D. J. (1980). Nursing Care Plans: The Nursing Process at Work. London: HM & M.Google Scholar
Kushlick, A. (1975). Some ways of setting, monitoring and attaining objectives for services with disabled people. Winchester, Hants. Health Care Evaluation Research Team. Report No. 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I. (1981). Assessment: a second dimension. In Special Education: Policy, Practices and Social Issues, Barton, L. and Tomkinson, S. (Eds), London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Marks-Moran, D. J. (1978). Patient allocation vs task allocation in relation to the nursing process. Nursing Times, 03 9th, 413–416.Google Scholar
Nihara, K., Foster, R., Shellhaas, M. and Leland, H. (1975). Adaptive Behaviour Scale for Children and Adults. Washington D.C.: American Association of Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
Samy, T. (1981). Practising what is preached. Nursing Mirror 2nd April, 36–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Townsend, P. (1973). The disabled in society. In The Social Minority, ch. 7, London: Allen Lane.Google ScholarPubMed
Willington, F. L. (1976). Incontinence in the Elderly, London: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Woods, P. A. and Cullen, C. (1983). Determinants of staff behaviour in long-term care. Behavioural Psychotherapy 11, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.