No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Incubation of Anxiety: A Theory Prematurely Hatched
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2009
Extract
In a recent paper Eysenck asked why conditioned responses show incrementation. In several publications he has provided the outline of an answer, which he has used in proposing a theory of the development of neuroses. It is suggested here that in the way he sets out the problem and in the development of his theory of incubation he overstates the applicability of the theory, incorporates questionable assumptions, and omits thorough consideration of competing accounts. The theory focuses on classical conditioning to the near-exclusion of other processes of behaviour change, ignores the consequences and social context of neurotic behaviour, and provides an incomplete discussion of the temporal patterning of relevant events. By taking a view which is broader in terms of psychological processes, environmental events, and temporal sequences, alternative models of the development of phobias can be offered. These involve classical and operant conditioning, and observational and informational learning.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1983
References
Bersh, P. J. (1980). Eysenck's theory of incubation: a critical analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy 18, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackman, D. E. (1974). Operant Conditioning: An Experimental Analysis of Behaviour. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Boyd, T. L. (1981). The effects of shock intensity on fear incubation (enhancement): a preliminary investigation of Eysenck's theory. Behaviour Research and Therapy 19, 413–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1968). A theory of the incubation of anxiety/fear responses. Behaviour Research and Therapy 6, 319—321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1976). The learning theory model of neurosis— a new approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy 14, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1982). Why do conditioned responses show incrementation, while unconditioned responses show habituation? Behavioural Psychotherapy 10, 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, A. J. and Chambless, D. L. (1978). A reanalysis of agoraphobia. Behaviour Therapy 9, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, H. D. (1979). Eysenck's model of neurotogenesis. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2, 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholaichuk, T. P., Quesnei, L. J. and Tait, R. W. (1982). Eysenck's theory of incubation: an empirical test. Behaviour Research and Therapy 20, 329–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rachman, S. (1977). The conditioning theory of fear-acquisition: a critical examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy 15, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimm, D. C., Janda, L. H., Lancaster, D. W., Nahl, M. and Dittmar, K. (1977). An exploratory investigation of the origin and maintenance of phobias. Behaviour Research and Therapy 15, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepney, R. E. G. (1979). Smoking as a psychological tool. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 32, 341–345.Google Scholar
Ullman, L. P. and Krasner, L. (1975). A Psychological Approach to Abnormal Behaviour (2nd Edit.). Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.