Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T03:18:09.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ethics of Motivational Interviewing Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

William R. Miller
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, USA

Abstract

In two separate commentaries, Withers and Seager offer constructive critiques of “The Ethics of Motivational Intervention.” It is difficult to render ethical judgments regarding a method apart from the goals and contexts within which it is to be applied. A clearer and transtheoretical understanding of the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of motivational interviewing may better inform future discussions of these ethical concerns that pertain to psychotherapy more generally.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Miller, W. R. (1994). Motivational interviewing: III. On the ethics of motivational intervention. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 22, 111123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Seager, M. (1995). Healing psychology's own motivational conflicts: a comment on Miller's “Ethics of motivational intervention.” Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 23, 341343.Google Scholar
Withers, M. J. (1995). Motivational interviewing: a special ethical dilemma? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 23, 335339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.