Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T12:49:48.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Self Rating Devices in Social Skills Assessment, and the Preliminary Investigation of a New Scale (S.O.C.S.I.T.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Peter Tyler  and
Paddy Tapsfield
Peter Tyler
Affiliation:
Senior Clinical Psychologist, Mersey Regional Alcohol and Drug Dependence Unit Senior Psychologist, Science 3 (R.A.F.), London
Paddy Tapsfield
Affiliation:
Senior Clinical Psychologist, Mersey Regional Alcohol and Drug Dependence Unit Senior Psychologist, Science 3 (R.A.F.), London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Self report instruments for assessing social competence are briefly reviewed. The amount of assistance available from the literature to those wishing to apply the scales psychometrically seems scarce, and construct infrastructure of many such scales is limited and insufficiently explicit. A new inventory was investigated, using three male samples (controls = 100; alcohol abusers = 160; other psychiatric = 58) from an Armed Services population. Results indicate an underlying factorial framework which comprises five separate scales, and data are presented which indicate the scale's potential usefulness in such ways as identifying candidates for social competence training, and for inter-group analyses of social competence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1984 , pp. 223 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argyle, M. (1981). Social behaviour. In Psychology for Social Workers. Herbert, M. (Ed.), Leicester: British Psychology Society.Google Scholar
Curran, J. P. and Mariotto, M. J. (1980). A conceptual structure for the assessment of social skills. In Progress in Behaviour Modification. Vol. 10, Hersen, et al. (Eds), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eisler, R. M., Hersen, M., Millar, P. M. and Blanchard, E. B. (1975). Situtational determinants of assertive behaviours. Journal of Consultative and Clinical Psychology 43, 330–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (1979). Assertiveness in three cultures: multidimensionality and cultural differences. Journal of Clinical Psychology 35, 522–527.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. and Henderson, M. (1981). Sex differences in self reported assertiveness in Britain. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 20, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galassi, J. P., Delo, J. S., Galassi, M. D. and Bastien, S. (1974). The college self expression scale: a measure of assertiveness. Behavior Therapy 5, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambrill, E. and Richey, C. (1975). An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research. Behavior Therapy 6, 550–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimberg, R. G. and Harrison, D. F. (1980). Use of Rathus assertiveness schedule with offenders: a question of questions. Behavior Therapy 11, 278–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersen, M., Bellack, A. S., Turner, S. M., Williams, M. T., Harper, K. and Watts, J. G. (1979). Psychometric properties of the Wolpe-Lazarus Assertiveness Schedule. Behaviour Research and Therapy 17, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, A. (1973). On assertive behaviour; a brief note. Behavior Therapy 4, 697–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorr, M., More, W. W. and Mansueto, C. S. (1981). The structure of assertiveness: a confirmatory study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 19, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorr, M. and Myhill, J. (1982). The expression of feelings as assertive behaviour: a factor analytic extension of PRI. Behaviour Research and Therapy 20, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, M. L. and Cohen, J. (1981). Trees in the forest: some components of social skills. Journal of Clinical Psychology 37, 342–347.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, A., Kindness, K. and McFadyen, M. (1983). Patients and social skills groups: do they lack social skills? Behavioural Psychotherapy 11, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, J., Bent, D. H. and Hull, C. H. (1981). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Rathus, S. A. (1973). A 30 item schedule for assessing assertive behaviour. Behavior Therapy 4, 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, F. V. and Tasto, D. L. (1976). Development and factor analysis of a social anxiety inventory. Behavior Therapy 7, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, S. (1980). Social skills training with children and adolescents. Windsor: N.F.E.R.Google Scholar
Turner, R. M., DiTomasso, R. A. and Murray, M. R. (1980). Psychometric analysis of the Willoughby personality schedule. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 11, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R. M., Meles, D. and DiTomasso, R. (1983). Assessment of social anxiety: a controlled comparison among social phobics, obsessive-compulsives, agoraphobics, sexual disorders and simple phobics. Behaviour Research and Therapy 21, 181–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D. and Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33, 448–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willoughby, R. R. (1932). Some properties of the Thurstone Personality Schedule and a suggested revision. Journal of Social Psychology 3, 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1973). The Practice of Behaviour Therapy. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.