Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:35:29.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Seven C's of CBT: A Consideration of the Future Challenges for Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Warren Mansell
Warren Mansell*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, UK
*
Reprint requests to Warren Mansell, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, Coupland I, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: warren.mansell@manchester.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

CBT is now considered to be a “family” of related therapies. Seven future challenges for CBT are defined and their relationships with one another considered. They are: clarity (shared definitions of CBT and its terminology), coherence (shared therapeutic principles and theory), cohesion (integration of individuals and subgroups using CBT), competence (assessing standards during training and personal development), convenience (accessibility and public awareness), comprehensiveness (applicability to a wide range of problems) and connectivity (links to other disciplines). Key issues concerning the fragmentation of the discipline and difficulties in judging competence are discussed. It is proposed that through improving the clarity, coherence and cohesion of CBT, there would be improvements in the remaining four domains, which would enhance its overarching efficacy and influence on improving public health.

Keywords

Cognitive therapyimproving accessstepped caretransdiagnosticpsychotherapy integration
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 36 , Issue 6: Developments in the Theory and Practice of Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies , November 2008 , pp. 641 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett-Levy, J. (2006). Therapist skills: a cognitive model of their acquisition and refinement. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 57–78.Google Scholar
Carey, T. (2005). Can patients specify treatment parameters? A preliminary investigation. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25, 326–335.Google Scholar
EABCT (2008). Common Language of Psychotherapy. http://www.eabct.eu/common_language.htm.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. (2004). Evolutionary Theory and Cognitive Therapy. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Grazebrook, K. and Garland, A. (2005). What are Cognitive and/or Behavioural Psychotherapies? http://www.babcp.com/babcp/what_is_CBT.htm.Google Scholar
Harvey, A. G., Watkins, E., Mansell, W. and Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive Behavioural Processes Across Psychological Disorders: a transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M. and Linehan, M. M. (2004). Mindfulness and Acceptance: expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hofmann, S. G. and Asmundson, G. J. G. (2008). Acceptance and mindfulness-based therapy: new wave or old hat? Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1–16..Google Scholar
IAPT Programme (2007). The Competencies Required to Deliver Effective Cognitive and Behavioural Therapy for People with Depression and with Anxiety Disorders. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
James, I., Blackburn, I., Milne, D. L. and Reichfelt, F. K. (2001). Moderatores of trainee therapists’ competence in cognitive therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 131–141.Google Scholar
Kazantis, N. (2003). Therapist competence in cognitive-behavioural therapies: review of the contemporary empirical evidence. Behaviour Change, 20, 1–12.Google Scholar
Mansell, W. (2005). Control theory and psychopathology: an integrative approach. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 141–178.Google Scholar
Milne, D. L., Baker, C., Blackburn, I., James, I. and Reichelt, F. K. (1999). Effectiveness of cognitive therapy training. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 30, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milne, D., Claydon, T., Blackburn, I., James, I. and Seikh, A. (2001). Rationale for a new measure of competence in therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 21–33.Google Scholar
Rachman, S. J. (1997). The evoluton of cognitive behaviour therapy. In Clark, D. M. and Fairburn, C. G. (Eds.), Science and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salkovskis, P. (2002). Empirically grounded clinical interventions: cognitive-behavioural therapy progresses through a multi-dimensional approach to clinical science. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, B. F., Elkin, I., Yamaguchi, J., Olmsted, M., Vallis, T. M., Dobson, K. S., Lowery, A., Sotsky, S. M., Watkins, J. T. and Imber, S. D. (1999). Therapist competence ratings in relation to clinical outcome in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 837–846.Google Scholar
Veale, D. (2008). Psychotherapy in dissent. Therapy Today, February Issue, 4–7.Google Scholar
Waddington, L. (2002). The therapy relationship in cognitive therapy: a review. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30, 179–191.Google Scholar
Young, J. E. and Beck, A. T. (1980). Cognitive Therapy Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.