Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:57:04.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The teacher-Child interaction Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

William Yule
Affiliation:
University of London Institute of Psychiatry.
Michael Berger
Affiliation:
University of London Institute of Education.
Veronica Wigley
Affiliation:
Inner London Education Authority.

Extract

Since 1969, there has been a slow, but steady, increase in the number of studies which have attempted to apply behavioural methods within the British school setting. The variety of papers reported in this volume attest to the wide level of current interest. Many reviewers of American experience (e.g. Sherman and Bushell, 1975;O'Leary and O'Leary, 1972) show that both academic and classroom behaviours have been investigated, and there is a general agreement that the aim of behavioural intervention is not necessarily to make children “be still, be quiet and be good” (Winnett and Winkler, 1972). Rather, the aim is to help the classroom teacher to use the ongoing teacher-child interaction in a deliberate, positive way so as to foster the optimum level of personal development and academic attainment in her pupils. This paper draws on our experiences of the past four years of training groups of teachers in behavioural management, and concentrates on some of the important issues involved in ensuring that behavioural intervention of the highest quality can be offered to teachers in schools.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berger, M., Yule, W. and Rutter, M. (1975) Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas: II. the prevalence of specific reading retardation. Brit. J. Psychiat., 126, 510519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, R. V. (1971) Managing Behaviour Parts I, II and III. Lawrence, Kansas: H and H Enterprises.Google Scholar
Hall, R. V. and Copeland, R. E. (1971) The responsive teaching model: a first step in shaping school personnel as behaviour modification specialists.Paper presented at Third Banff International Conference on Behaviour Modification.Google Scholar
O'Leary, K. D. and O'Leary, S. G. (Eds) (1972) Classroom management: The successful use of behaviour modification. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Cox, A., Tupling, C., Berger, M. and Yule, W. (1975) Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas: I. The prevalence of psychiatric disorder. Brit. J. Psychiat., 126, 493509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. A. and Bushell, D. (1975) Behaviour modification as an educational technique. In Horowitz, F. D. (Ed) Review of Child Development Research Vol. 4. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stein, T. J. (1975) Some ethical considerations of short-term workshops in the principles and methods of behaviour modification. J. Appl. Behav. Anal., 8, 113115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, R. G. and Wetzel, R. J. (1969) Behaviour Modification in the Natural Environment. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tizard, J. (1973) Maladjusted children and the child guidance service. London Educ. Rev., 2, 2237.Google Scholar
Winnett, R. A. and Winkler, R. C. (1972) Current behaviour modification in the classroom: be still, be quiet, be docile. J. Appl. Behav. Anal., 5, 499504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, W. (1975) Teaching psychological principles to non-psychologists. 2. Training parents in child management. J. Ass. Educ. Psychol., 10(3), 516.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.