Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Cutler, Anne
Weber, Andrea
Smits, Roel
and
Cooper, Nicole
2004.
Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 6,
p.
3668.
Carroll, Susanne E.
2004.
Segmentation: Learning How to ‘Hear Words’ in the L2 Speech Stream.
Transactions of the Philological Society,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 2,
p.
227.
Norris, Dennis
Cutler, Anne
McQueen, James M.
and
Butterfield, Sally
2006.
Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension.
Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
146.
Mitterer, Holger
2006.
On the causes of compensation for coarticulation: Evidence for phonological mediation.
Perception & Psychophysics,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 7,
p.
1227.
CLAHSEN, HARALD
and
FELSER, CLAUDIA
2006.
Grammatical processing in language learners.
Applied Psycholinguistics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Mária, Gósy
and
Magdolna, Kovács
2008.
Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems.
p.
361.
Shi, Lu-Feng
2010.
Perception of Acoustically Degraded Sentences in Bilingual Listeners Who Differ in Age of English Acquisition.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 4,
p.
821.
Lecumberri, Maria Luisa Garcia
Cooke, Martin
and
Cutler, Anne
2010.
Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review.
Speech Communication,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 11-12,
p.
864.
SEKERINA, IRINA A.
and
TRUESWELL, JOHN C.
2011.
Processing of contrastiveness by heritage Russian bilinguals.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
280.
Boudewyn, Megan A.
Gordon, Peter C.
Long, Debra
Polse, Lara
and
Swaab, Tamara Y.
2012.
Does discourse congruence influence spoken language comprehension before lexical association? Evidence from event-related potentials.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 5,
p.
698.
Andringa, Sible
Olsthoorn, Nomi
van Beuningen, Catherine
Schoonen, Rob
and
Hulstijn, Jan
2012.
Determinants of Success in Native and Non‐Native Listening Comprehension: An Individual Differences Approach.
Language Learning,
Vol. 62,
Issue. s2,
p.
49.
Pickering, Lucy
Hu, Guiling
and
Baker, Amanda
2012.
Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching.
Vol. 15,
Issue. ,
p.
199.
Suárez, Lidia
and
Goh, Winston D.
2013.
Recognition memory for foreign language lexical stress.
Memory & Cognition,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 6,
p.
872.
Cutler, Anne
and
McQueen, James
2014.
Above and Beyond the Segments.
p.
71.
Shi, Lu-Feng
2014.
Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
International Journal of Audiology,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 1,
p.
30.
Morrill, Tuuli H.
McAuley, J. Devin
Dilley, Laura C.
Zdziarska, Patrycja A.
Jones, Katherine B.
and
Sanders, Lisa D.
2015.
Distal prosody affects learning of novel words in an artificial language.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 3,
p.
815.
Gray, Mark
2015.
Investigating English Pronunciation.
p.
174.
Mompean, Jose A.
2015.
Investigating English Pronunciation.
p.
1.
Nagy, Judit
2015.
The use of intonational cues marking new information in non-native speech.
EduLingua,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
1.
van Maastricht, Lieke
Krahmer, Emiel
and
Swerts, Marc
2016.
Native speaker perceptions of (non-)native prominence patterns: Effects of deviance in pitch accent distributions on accentedness, comprehensibility, intelligibility, and nativeness.
Speech Communication,
Vol. 83,
Issue. ,
p.
21.