Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:00:09.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilingual education, metalinguistic awareness, and the understanding of an unknown language*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2010

HAGAR TER KUILE ,
MICHIEL VELDHUIS ,
SUZANNE C. VAN VEEN  and
JELTE M. WICHERTS
HAGAR TER KUILE
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
MICHIEL VELDHUIS
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
SUZANNE C. VAN VEEN
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
JELTE M. WICHERTS*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
Address for correspondence: Jelte M. Wicherts, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlandsj.m.wicherts@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An increasing number of schools offer bilingual programs, where lessons are taught in more than one language. Several theories state that bilinguals have greater metalinguistic awareness than monolinguals. We investigated whether this greater metalinguistic awareness is also related to an increased ability to understand an unknown language. To measure metalinguistic awareness and the ability to understand text written in an unknown language, we designed the Indonesian Language Test (ILT). The ILT consists of items regarding a story in Indonesian. Dutch high school students from monolingual and bilingual classes were administered the ILT, a Dutch Language Test, an English Language Test, and a general intelligence test. The ILT showed promising psychometric properties. Bilingual students scored significantly higher on the ILT than monolingual students. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses showed (i) that ILT measures the ability to understand an unknown language, and (ii) that bilingual students score significantly higher than monolingual students on this ability. Both observations support the notion that bilingual education increases metalinguistic awareness and therefore the ability to understand an unknown language.

Keywords

bilingual educationmetalinguistic awarenesslanguage acquisitionIndonesian Language Test
Type
Research Notes
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 233 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The preparation of this article was supported by VENI grant no. 451-07-016 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

References

Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1947). Differential aptitude tests. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., McBride-Chang, C., & Luk, G. (2005). Bilingualism, language proficiency, and learning to read in two writing systems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R., & Sais, E. (1995). Accelerated metalinguistic (phonological) awareness in bilingual children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelenbos, P., & de Jong, J. H. A. L. (2004). Vreemdetalenonderwijs in Nederland: Een situatieschets [Second language education in The Netherlands: An overview]. http://www.nabmvt.nl/publicaties/00013/ (retrieved January 12, 2007).Google Scholar
Edwards, H. T., & Kirkpatrick, A. G. (1999). Metalinguistic awareness in children: A developmental progression. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evers, A., & Lucassen, W. (1983). DAT'83 Differentiële Aanleg Testserie [Differential Aptitude Test series]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Griessler, M. (2001). The effects of third language learning on second language proficiency: An Austrian example. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4, 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Klein, E. C. (1995). Second versus third language acquisition: Is there a difference? Language Learning, 45, 419–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazaruk, W. (2007). Linguistic, academic, and cognitive benefits of French immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubke, G. H., Dolan, C. V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2003). On the relationship between sources of within- and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model. Intelligence, 31, 543–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransdell, S., Barbier, M., & Niit, T. (2006). Metacognitions about language skill and working memory among monolingual and bilingual college students: When does multilingualism matter? The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 728–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Ter Kuile, H., Veldhuis, M., & van Veen, S. C. (2006). De invloed van tweetalig onderwijs op het begrip van een onbekende taal [The influence of binlingual education on the understanding of an unknown language]. Internal report, Psychology Department, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1988). The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 68, 848–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & Hessen, D. J. (2005). Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: A question of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 696–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zipke, M. (2007). The role of metalinguistic awareness in the reading comprehension of sixth and seventh graders. Reading Psychology, 28, 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar