Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T04:21:26.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the Politics of Inclusion and Difference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Steve Epstein
Steve Epstein
Affiliation:
Dept of Sociology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr #0533, La Jolla, CA 92093-0533, USA E-mail: sepstein@ucsd.edu
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Books Forum
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 234 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duster, T. (1984). A social frame for biological knowledge. In Duster, T. & Garrett, K. (Eds), Cultural perspectives on biological knowledge, 1–40. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Duster, T. (1990). Backdoor to eugenics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duster, T. (2003). Buried alive: The concept of race in science. In Goodman, A. H.Heath, D. & Lindee, M.S. (Eds), Genetic nature/culture: Anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide, 258–277. Berkeley: U California Press.Google Scholar
Duster, T. (2005). Race and reification in science. Science, 307(5712), 1050–1051.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (2007a). Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. Chicago: U Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (2007b). Patient groups and health movements. In Hackett, E.J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M. & Wajcman, J. (Eds), The handbook of science and technology studies, 499–539. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42, 390–407.Google Scholar
Haraway, D.J. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millennium.Femaleman_meets oncomouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rabeharisoa, V. (2006). From representation to mediation: The shaping of collective mobilization on muscular dystrophy in France. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 564–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabeharisoa, V., & Callon, M. (2002). The involvement of patients’ associations in research. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 57–63.Google Scholar
Rabeharisoa, V., & Callon, M. (2004). Patients and scientists in French muscular dystrophy research. In Jasanoff, S.(Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, 142–160. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Shim, J.K. (2002). Race, class, and gender across the science-lay divide: Expertise, experience, and ‘difference’ in cardiovascular disease. PhD dissertation, Sociology, U California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Smart, A., Tutton, R., Ashcroft, R., Martin, P., Balmer, A., Elliot, R. et al. (forthcoming). Social inclusivity vs analytical acuity? A qualitative study of UK researchers regarding the inclusion of minority ethnic groups in biobanks. Medical Law International.Google Scholar