Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T02:33:44.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expert psychiatric reports for the Parole Board for England and Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2024

Laura Middleton
Affiliation:
Specialist registrar (Specialty Trainee Year 4, ST4) in forensic psychiatry with Health Education England North West, Liverpool, UK. She currently works within Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Lynne Daly
Affiliation:
Consultant adolescent forensic psychiatrist and specialist psychiatric member of the Parole Board for England and Wales, London, UK. Dr Daly has a detailed insight into the parole process and extensive experience of its operationalisation in practice.
Rajan Nathan*
Affiliation:
Consultant forensic psychiatrist with Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK, Visiting Professor at the University of Chester, Adjunct Professor at Liverpool John Moores University, and Mental Health Lead and Clinical Lead of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network, North West Coast (CRN NWC), based in the Churton House Resource Centre, Chester, UK. He has worked in a wide range of clinical settings, including secure hospitals, prisons and the community. He has significant experience of undertaking independent psychiatric assessments for parole hearings.
*
Correspondence Rajan Nathan. Email: t.nathan@chester.ac.uk

Summary

The Parole Board for England and Wales advises on the release, recall and licence conditions of a small subgroup of prisoners serving determinate sentences and the majority of those serving indeterminate sentences. Since the establishment of the Parole Board in 1968, the parole process has been shaped and clarified by further legislation and case law. In certain scenarios, psychiatric expert evidence may be sought to inform the Board's determination of whether a prisoner can be safely released into the community. Psychiatrists preparing expert reports for the Parole Board should be familiar with the current operationalisation of parole. This involves an understanding not only of the functioning of the Parole Board, but also of the criminal justice context in which prisoners subject to parole are managed. Having set the scene, by describing the role of the Parole Board and the wider context, this article examines how to undertake assessments and complete psychiatric reports for the Board.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, C, Nathan, R (2022) A phenomenological approach to understanding the association between psychosis and violence. BJPsych Open, 8 (suppl 1): s40–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, P (2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime: A New Approach. Cabinet Office Strategy Unit.Google Scholar
Guiney, T (2018) Getting Out: Early Release in England and Wales, 1960–1995. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, N (2018) Parole – 50 years and counting. Prison Service Journal, 137: 50–3.Google Scholar
HM Prison and Probation Service (2021) A Response to the HMI Prisons Inspection: A thematic inspection on Outcomes for Young Adults in Custody [Action Plan: Outcomes for Young Adults in Custody]. HM Prison and Probation Service (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/608153268fa8f51b94010066/Outcomes_for_Young_Adults_Action_Plan_March_2021.pdf).Google Scholar
Jones, M (2020) Transparency in the parole system. Inside Time, 3 Feb (https://insidetime.org/transparency-in-the-parole-system).Google Scholar
Kercher, B (2003) Perish or prosper: the law and convict transportation in the British empire, 1700–1850. Law and History Review, 21: 527–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2018a) Review of the Law, Policy and Procedure Relating to Parole Board Decisions (Cm 9611). Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2018b) Technical Guide and Glossary: Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service Annual Staff Equalities Report 2017/18. Ministry of Justice (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/759401/hmpps-annual-staff-equalities-guide-nov-2018.pdf).Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2022) Root and Branch Review of the Parole System: The Future of the Parole System in England and Wales (CP 654). Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Nathan, R, Wilson, P (2020) The clinical assessment of acts of violence: mental mechanisms and subjectivity. BJPsych Advances, 26: 135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R, Bhandari, S (2024) Risk assessment in clinical practice: a framework for decision-making in real-world complex systems. BJPsych Advances, 30: 5363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National MAPPA, Team (2024) MAPPA Guidance (updated April 2024). HM Prison and Probation Service (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/multi-agency-public-protection-arrangements-mappa-guidance).Google Scholar
Newson, N (2023) Sentences of Imprisonment for Public Protection: Updated Action Plan. House of Lords Library (https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/sentences-of-imprisonment-for-public-protection-updated-action-plan).Google Scholar
O'Hagan, A, Elliott, A (2018) Offender management: a review of approaches, benefits and challenges. Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal, 6: 527–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parole Board for England and Wales (2020) Guidance on Restricted Patients and the Mental Health Act (v1.0). The Parole Board.Google Scholar
Parole Board for England and Wales (2022a) Types of Cases Guidance (v2.0). The Parole Board.Google Scholar
Parole Board for England and Wales (2022b) The Parole Board Decision-Making Framework: Framework Guidance (v1.2). The Parole Board.Google Scholar
Parole Board for England and Wales (2023a) The Parole Board for England and Wales: Annual Report & Accounts 2022/2023. The Parole Board.Google Scholar
Parole Board for England and Wales (2023b) Work with Us: Parole Board Member Recruitment. The Parole Board (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/work-with-us).Google Scholar
Parole Board for England and Wales (2023c) Guidance on Allegations (v2.0). The Parole Board.Google Scholar
Parole Board for England and Wales (2023d) Specialist Reports Guidance (v1.1). The Parole Board.Google Scholar
Rix, K, Mynors-Wallis, L, Craven, C (2020) Rix's Expert Psychiatric Evidence (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rix, K, Eastman, N, Adshead, G, et al (2023) Responsibilities of Psychiatrists Who Provide Expert Evidence to Courts and Tribunals (College Report CR193). Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Scurich, N (2018) The case against categorical risk estimates. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 36: 554–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, LM, Hackett, PM (2023) Offender Rehabilitation Programmes: The Role of the Prison Officer. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, D, Mallett, S, Lennox, B, et al (2023) Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV). BMJ Mental Health, 26(1): e300634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R (Bailey and Morris) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 555.Google Scholar
R (DSD and NBV) v The Parole Board of England and Wales [2018] EWHC 694.Google Scholar
R (Osborn) v Parole Board [2013] UKSC 61.Google Scholar
R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales [2023] UKSC 13.Google Scholar
R (Bailey and Morris) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 555.Google Scholar
R (DSD and NBV) v The Parole Board of England and Wales [2018] EWHC 694.Google Scholar
R (Osborn) v Parole Board [2013] UKSC 61.Google Scholar
R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales [2023] UKSC 13.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.