Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T00:57:12.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact factor and psychiatry journals: an international perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sundararajan Rajagopal
Sundararajan Rajagopal*
Affiliation:
Chennai, India, email rajagsr@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The impact factor (IF) is a metric for assessing academic journals. Despite its shortcomings, the IF is the preeminent yardstick by which the quality of scientific journals is determined. In this paper, the key aspects of the IF are covered from an international perspective, with a specific emphasis on psychiatry journals.

Type
Special Paper
Information
BJPsych International , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 15 - 18
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017

References

Alberts, B. (2013) Impact factor distortions. Science, 340, 787.Google Scholar
Brink, P. A. (2013) Article visibility: journal impact factor and availability of full text in PubMed Central and open access. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 24, 295–296.Google Scholar
Casadevall, A. & Fang, F. C. (2014) Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. MBio, 5, e00064–14. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643863 (accessed December 2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colquhoun, D. (2003) Challenging the tyranny of impact factors. Nature, 423, 479.Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1955) Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108–111.Google Scholar
Lariviere, V. & Gingras, Y. (2010) The impact factor's Matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 424–427.Google Scholar
Rao, T. S. S. & Andrade, C. (2014) Indian Journal of Psychiatry: changes in instructions to contributors. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 319–320.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. C., Menegazzi, J. J. & Yealy, D. M. (2012) Emergency medicine journal impact factor and change compared to other medical and surgical specialties. Academic Emergency Medicine, 19, 1248–1254.Google Scholar
van der Wall, E. E. (2012) Journal impact factor: holy grail? Netherlands Heart Journal, 20, 385–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Diest, P. J., Holzel, H., Burnett, D., et al (2001) Impactitis: new cures for an old disease. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 54, 817–819.Google Scholar
Way, M. & Ahmad, S. A. (2013) The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Journal of Cell Science, 126, 1903–1904.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.