Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:34:04.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Audit of Physical Health and Blood Test Monitoring in Patients Under the Care of Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust Who Are Prescribed Lithium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Declan Hyland*
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Gopal Chinnari
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Tawfik Elhaj-Houssen
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Rose-Anne Orrell
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Lithium is clinically indicated for use in the UK for treatment and prophylaxis of mania, bipolar disorder, recurrent depressive disorder and aggressive of self-harming behaviour. In patients who are prescribed lithium, several physical health checks and blood tests must be completed on a regular basis to ensure lithium remains safe and appropriate to continue. Lithium has a narrow therapeutic index and so close monitoring of serum lithium level is required.

This audit aimed to establish whether Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust’s physical health check and blood test monitoring of patients prescribed lithium is in keeping with NICE guidelines and determine how the Trust’s performance compared with national performance as identified by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health (POMH) lithium audit.

Methods

A total of 127 patients under the care of the Trust who were prescribed lithium were identified. The POMH lithium audit tool was used to capture data for each patient as Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust was participating in the POMH lithium audit. Each patient's electronic record was scrutinised to determine whether the following were measured every six months during maintenance treatment – Thyroid Function Tests (TFTs), serum calcium level, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and serum lithium level, and whether the patient had a weight/body mass index (BMI)/waist circumference within the last 12 months.

Results

Of the 127 lithium patients included in the audit, 64% had a serum calcium level done every six months, 78% had TFTs done every six months, 83% had an eGFR done every six months, and 87% had a serum lithium level done every six months. 71% of patients had a weight/BMI/waist circumference within the last 12 months.

Conclusion

Trust performance for TFT monitoring and weight/BMI/waist circumference was above the national compliance level reported in the POMH lithium audit; Trust performance for serum lithium level, eGFR and serum calcium level was below the national compliance level. There is a need to ensure that medical and nursing staff are aware of the physical health checks and blood test monitoring required for patients maintained on lithium. A Quality Performance Alert will be sent to medical and nursing staff in the Trust to raise awareness and lithium monitoring will be included in the junior doctor Trust induction. Future auditing of Trust performance on physical health check and blood test monitoring for patients maintained on lithium will be conducted.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.