Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:34:39.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the Impact of the 2024 National Student Psychiatry Conference on Medical Student Career Aspirations and Subspecialty Interest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Dayo Taslim*
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Karthik Venkateswaran
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Oscar Han
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Abdullah Ahmad
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The 2024 National Student Psychiatry Conference, hosted at the University of Sheffield with the theme 'Me, Myself and I,' explored the intersection of the ‘self' and the ‘other.' It delved into the dynamics of individuals in the context of their lived experiences, environment, and emerging paradigms within psychiatry and beyond. Talks and workshops aimed to heighten attendees’ interest in psychiatry by challenging societal stigma and traditional norms and expanding their perspectives of psychiatry.

Methods

The pre-conference questionnaire included attendees’ year of study, university/NHS trust affiliation, current likelihood of pursuing psychiatry and career aspirations, knowledge of conference themes, and ten subspecialties represented at the conference via a faculty carousel. The post-conference questionnaire enquired about changes to the above aforementioned factors, to explore changes in career aspirations. Standardized dropdown options were used in both forms to facilitate data evaluation.

Results

71 attendees were included in the final evaluation; 17 were excluded due to duplication or not completing both forms. Of the attendees, 31% were in their pre-clinical years, 56% were in their clinical years, and 4% were doctors. 9% of the participants were non-medical attendees.

Demographics of attendees included a majority from Yorkshire and Humber (52%), Midlands (11%), South England (6%), North England (10%), North East (8%) and Others (13%).

21% of attendees had been to a prior psychiatry-related conference and 34% were currently taking part in or had completed a psychiatry-related project in the past.

The level of interest in attendees aspiring to pursue psychiatry increased from 62% to 72%. An increased interest in medical psychotherapy (82%), forensic psychiatry (68%), and perinatal psychiatry (67%) after the faculty carousel was observed.

Following the conference, 97% reported increased knowledge of each theme. Findings from the faculty carousel revealed that, on average, over 90% of attendees reported an increased understanding of each speciality represented.

Conclusion

The National Student Psychiatry Conference plays a significant role in increasing exposure of psychiatry to medical students and increasing their understanding of the diverse career paths within the speciality. The conference fosters networking opportunities and facilitates meaningful connections within the field, positively influencing attendees' considerations and perceptions.

Type
2 Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.