Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T12:51:18.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Audit of inpatient smoking cessation advice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Flensham Mohamed*
Affiliation:
Aneuran Bevan University Health Board
Mohamed Bader
Affiliation:
Aneurin Bevan University Healthboard
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Audit carried out to assess whether or not patients had been asked about their smoking status during admission onto an acute adult mental health ward, as well as if they had received any smoking cessation advice or offered nicotine replacement therapy.

Background

  • Physical health outcomes in patients with serious mental illness (SMI) are consisitently worse than the general public This is due to multiple factors; adverse effects of medication (including metabolic syndromes with psychotropics) as well as poor lifestyle factors such as smoking status

  • Patients with an SMI are 3–6 times more likely to die due to coronary artery disease. 70% of patients in inpatient psychiatric units are smokers, a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

  • Smoking cessation is a potent modifiable risk factor that can prevent mortality and reduce morbidity.

Method

A cross-sectional review of all 34 inpatients across four general adult acute psychiatric wards.

Patient records were explored using the Aneuran Bevan Health Board admission proformas to identify evidence of smoking status and whether advice was offered.

Result

Smoker but not given cessation advice n = 13 (38%)

Not asked about smoking n = 11 (32%)

Smoker and given cessation advice n = 4 (12%)

Non-smoker n = 6 (18%)

Conclusion

Patients were asked about their smoking status the majority of the time (68%) but provision of advice or nicotine replacement therapy was only done in 14% of potential smokers (identified smokers and patients not asked about smoking status).

A consideration to be taken into account is that on admission, a patient's physical health status may be unknown, with the additional difficulty of a patient's acute distress complicating the physical examination, smoking status and modification of patient's smoking status may not be the highest priory in that context.

Data regarding asking about smoking were different amongst wards, potentially signifying differences between assessors willingness to ask about smoking status.

There is a lack of smoking cessation literature available on the wards and patients are often unaware of what options are available to quit smoking.

The audit simply determined whether or not assessors were documenting smoking status, it does not measure the quantity or quality of smoking cessation advice provided.

Further quality improvement projects should be launched, with focus groups as the intial step at further investigating inpatient smoking rates, as well as attempting to reduce them in a more systemic way.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.