Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:35:56.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Audit on Discharge Summaries From General Adult Inpatient Units to Primary Care at Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Pallavi Chandra*
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Sandwell, United Kingdom
Omair Ahmed
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Sandwell, United Kingdom
Bhavika Vajawat
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Olutobi Ojuawo
Affiliation:
Oakeswell Health Centre, Wednesbury, United Kingdom
Prateek Varshney
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley, London, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Discharge summaries act as a key source of condensed information of inpatient stay as well as follow-up plan. Its timely availability to primary care and other multi-disciplinary teams involved in patient care is vital, especially when patients are being managed out of locality by different teams.

The project aimed at assessing if discharge summaries for General Adult inpatients across all four localities of the Trust was made available and in a timely fashion on patient electronic records as well as to primary care using national guidelines as the standard. Using the same guidelines, it also evaluated the quality of the summaries based on the information contained.

Methods

Data was retrospectively collected in October 2023 for general adult inpatient discharges for the month of January 2023 across all four localities of Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Records for 148 out of the 152 discharges were assessed. Data was collected from electronic patient records Rio and evaluated on Microsoft Excel. The evaluation checked whether discharge summaries were available, duration between discharge and its availability on electronic records as well as contents of summary. Professional Record Standards Body and the RCPsych guidelines were used as standards.

Results

28 of the 148 (18.9%) patients did not have a completed discharge summary. Of these, 14 (9.4%) were out of locality patients. The average duration from discharge to summary being made available was 12.7 days. Most of the summaries contained all relevant information as per guidelines.

Conclusion

The findings were presented to the Trust’s QI committee. It was concluded that while majority patients had a summary made available, there is a need for additional strategies to ensure summaries are available soon after discharge to ensure safe post-discharge care.

It was identified that the bed management team should notify parent teams of admissions and discharges promptly.

The medical secretary is to monitor the admissions register and ensure the junior doctors in the team complete discharge summaries in a timely manner.

Business intelligence team to use clinical coding to identify any missing discharge summaries and provide medical teams with a monthly report in case any are missed by the secretaries.

Once above recommendations are implemented, a re-audit would help to analyse the improvements in practice. The results would also help guide the Trust in developing a policy to harmonise processes across the Trust and thereby ensure safe patient care post-discharge.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.