Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:38:38.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating Multiprofessional Caseload Review in the Community Mental Health Team One Year On: Improving Patient Flow and Creating a More Responsive Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Zarina Anwar*
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
Olivia McClure
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of multidisciplinary outpatient caseload reviews in the community mental health team (CMHT).

Methods

Caseload review for all patients under the outpatient clinics within South Leicestershire CMHT commenced in August 2022. A consultant psychiatrist and senior nurse spent 2–4 hours weekly reviewing each patient's electronic record chronologically from those waiting the longest for an appointment guided by a template including variables such as stability, risk and medication. Based on clinical need, the patient may be offered an outpatient appointment for ongoing treatment or review for discharge, nurse discharge clinic or transfer to another service.

This process is now embedded into routine clinical work, and momentum sustained by clinical and operational leadership roles within the team. The cycle is iterative and ongoing to ensure patients new to the service are included and flow from referral to discharge maintained.

Results

Between August 2022 to January 2024, 1460 out of a total of 1699 caseload reviews were completed. 622 (42%) of these are identified as suitable to be reviewed for discharge.

Of those, 256 (41%) were suitable for nurse discharge clinic, and 366 (59%) by a medic.

110 patients received an outpatient appointment following nurse discharge clinic, clinically indicated in 25.

Average additional wait time for an outpatient appointment has reduced from 34 weeks (September 2022) to 22 weeks (January 2024).

Conclusion

Consultant Psychiatrists in the CMHT frequently hold high outpatient caseloads with associated delays to care and treatment, and limited capacity and flexibility to respond dynamically to patient need contributing to reduced job satisfaction and burnout. Embedding multiprofessional caseload review into routine work creates greater capacity and responsiveness, reducing outpatient wait times and improving quality of care by earlier identification of those needing more expeditious review. Continuing this in an iterative cycle aligns with key principles of community transformation in the NHS Long Term Plan ensuring effective caseload management and fostering a more dynamic and responsive approach to meet patient need. Engaging senior clinicians and administrative staff is critical to successful implementation and close joint working has a positive ripple effect on team cohesion, morale and shared clinical decision making. The benefits are recognised at Trust board level with funding secured from the local Integrated Care Board to implement caseload reviews across all CMHTs within Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust.

Type
4 Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.