Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:35:37.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the Clinical Significance of Assessing Previous Gambling Problems Before Initiating Antipsychotic Treatment: An Audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Evelyn Farthing*
Affiliation:
GMMH, Manchester, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

This audit aims to address the critical link between antipsychotics and impulsive behaviors, particularly pathological gambling, by emphasizing the importance of assessing patients' gambling history before initiating antipsychotic treatment. The focus is on patients under the care of the Bolton Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIT) service, with the aim of meeting the standard set by NICE guidelines, ensuring that 100% of patients started on antipsychotics are asked about their previous gambling history.

Methods

Data was collected from prescription and shared care protocol lists for patients prescribed antipsychotics in the last six months. The PARIS progress notes and clinical correspondence were then searched to determine if patients had been asked about gambling.

Results

The audit revealed a significant gap in the practice, with minimal adherence to NICE guidelines regarding assessing gambling history before prescribing antipsychotics. Out of 35 patients, only one was asked about gambling history.

Conclusion

The recommendations for improvement include incorporating a gambling prompt into the medical review proforma, educating the team about the importance of this assessment, and adding the Problem Gambling Severity Index to the initial review by EIT.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.