Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:33:35.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring the Feasibility of Suicide Prevention Intervention for Individuals With First Episode Psychosis Experiencing Suicidal Ideation: A Multi-Center, Mixed Method Study From Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Zaib un Nisa
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan
Tayyeba Kiran
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan
Jordan Bamford
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester, UK, Manchester, United Kingdom
Imran Bashir Chaudhry*
Affiliation:
Zia ud Din university Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
Nusrat Husain
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

First Episode Psychosis (FEP) emerges at a young age, significantly shaping the trajectory of the disorder. Literature indicates a 60% increased risk of suicide within the initial year of diagnosis in FEP, early intervention in psychosis reduces the risk of suicide. Therefore, this study aims to co-adapt an existing culturally appropriate suicide prevention intervention (CMAP) and integrate this with a culturally adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis (CaCBTp) for individuals with FEP experiencing suicidal ideation and to test its feasibility and acceptability in Pakistan.

Methods

This is a mixed-method study that involves two stages. Stage 1 was co-adaptation of the CMAP intervention for people with FEP patients. This involved one-to-one, in-depth interviews with individuals with FEP (n = 5), carers (n = 5) and a focus group discussion with 10 healthcare professionals. The second stage involves feasibility testing of the intervention. Participants are being recruited (n = 90) from outpatient psychiatric units across the cities of Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Multan, and Hyderabad in Pakistan. Eligible, consented participants are being randomized into either of two trial arms; intervention arm or treatment as usual arm (TAU). All participants are being assessed at baseline and at 3-month post-randomization on assessing participants on severity of suicidal ideation, severity of symptoms, functionality and quality of life using different scales. The intervention is comprised of 12 one-to-one sessions delivered over 3 months by trained therapists. Participants (n = 15) from the intervention arm will be interviewed at the end of intervention to explore the acceptance.

Results

Qualitative analysis of stage 1, utilizing thematic framework analysis, highlights barriers to help-seeking such as lack of awareness, inadequate social support, and mental health stigma. To adapt CMAP intervention, participants suggested changes in the use of Urdu words to make content simple for patients to understand, increase number of family sessions, include information about possible risk and protective factors of self-harm in this population and emphasize the addition of resilience-building messages in the manual. Stage 2 is currently ongoing, and we have successfully recruited healthcare facilities across all sites and randomized 12 participants into the trial.

Conclusion

This study will add valuable insights for refinement of existing interventions to address the unique needs of individuals with FEP in Pakistan. Intervention with suicide preventive strategies may help in reducing the risk of suicide. The culturally grounded approach ensures relevance, contributing to the global discourse on evidence-based mental health interventions.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.