Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T03:21:41.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Induction Folder for New Doctors in Psychiatry in North Wales- a Quality Improvement Project to Make Life Easy for Junior Doctors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Sathyan Soundararajan*
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
Asha Dhandapani
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
Catherine Baker
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The purpose of induction is to welcome our new employees and also ensure that they have the information and support to carry out their roles effectively. A robust induction not only benefits the doctor but also helps employers to ensure the delivery of high-quality patient care, increases retention, reduces absenteeism, and will promote the organization as a good employer. Doctors need to be supported in the workplace to provide safe, high-quality patient care. Induction as a minimum should introduce doctors to employer procedures and rules, arrangements for clinical governance (patient safety, clinical errors, clinical risk management, complaints, and litigation), orientation, and support. We have developed a new Induction folder containing all the necessary information for a beginner in Psychiatry in North Wales

Methods

We initially arranged for a preintervention questionnaire for the Junior doctors in Psychiatry in North Wales. That included Core trainees, Foundation year doctors, Senior house officers (LAS CT- SHO, JCF- non-training post), and GP trainees.

The QIP started in 2019 August with Audits followed by PDSA cycles. Over a period of 2 years, various doctors both from the present and from the last 3 years were contacted via email and google forms. We completed 3 PDSA cycles.

During these 2 years, we included certain topics that were missed, such as medication during an emergency, contact details from the deanery, etc. We have been following up on the Induction folder with the new doctors as and when there is new recruitment.

Results

The first PDSA showed promising results. Following the first PDSA, we amended a few changes in order to improve the response which resulted in an overwhelmingly positive response from the new doctors/ old doctors in Psychiatry. Following the third PDSA, we included details from the deanery contact and updated the contact details from our own trust.

Conclusion

2 years of work on this project has yielded good results. However, the sustainability of changes is questionable. This indicates continuity in changes. We are hoping that the new trainee doctors, either junior or senior trainees can consider working on this project and continue to amend changes on yearly basis.

The amended version of the folder can be completed at least 4 weeks prior to the major induction that happens every August.

We will consider sharing the Induction folder as handbooks/ pdf versions to all the trainees and non-trainees in our trust. Apart from this, we will continue to keep the information at a high quality and standards. We will achieve this by ensuring feedback from the new doctors.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.