Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:33:26.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrating Spirituality Into Mental Health Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Joanna Barber
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Christopher Cook*
Affiliation:
Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To find how best to integrate religion/spirituality (R/S) into clinical care.

Methods

This was a qualitative study. 41 mental health patients of varying diagnoses in secondary care underwent semi-structured interviews describing their mental health and spiritual journeys and how these have interacted, before, during and after a period of acute illness. Grounded theory was used. Detailed coding was carried out and themes extracted.

Results

Preliminary results from this project have already been reported, (submitted for publication). 5 main processes by which R/S interacted positively or negatively with mental health recovery were identified:

  • R/S experiences, (+ve or -ve),

  • Existential crisis, (-ve),

  • Influence of faith community, (+ve or -ve),

  • Finding a personally meaningful faith, (+ve),

  • Changing priorities to a more spiritual outlook, (+ve).

Further analysis has allowed a comparison between our different participants who were at different stages of recovery:
  1. 1. Those who described themselves most as being in recovery tended to have more positive R/S experiences, support from a faith community, a personally meaningful faith and have changed their priorities. Most have also found clinical care helpful. However, often R/S was considered more helpful both for personal recovery and symptom relief. For others in this group, R/S enables living a satisfying life despite limitations of illness partially controlled by medication.

  2. 2. Those who described themselves most as struggling with mental illness were much less likely to have a personally meaningful faith or had changed their priorities. They tended to have negative R/S experiences, persistent existential crisis and/or rejection from a faith community. Most of these people find both clinical care and R/S issues unhelpful. Some people were finding clinical care helpful but R/S barriers were blocking their recovery.

Many people at all stages of recovery said they wanted more help with R/S issues. They often regard their illness as a spiritual problem and consider positive R/S experiences a key to recovery.

Conclusion

Spiritual health may be important for recovery from many mental health problems and needs to be addressed according to the 5 themes.

  • Possible R/S barriers identified, even if symptoms seem to be responding to clinical treatment.

  • Positive R/S experiences and/or support from a faith community used to help overcome R/S barriers.

  • Support made available to find a personally meaningful faith and change priorities.

  • Referral to spiritual care offered more frequently.

Clinical care will be most effective if combined with facilitating spiritual health.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.