Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:35:31.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction of the DUNDRUM Triage Urgency Tool to a Medium Secure Unit in Bed Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Leanne Duthie*
Affiliation:
NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Alistair Morris
Affiliation:
NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

At a time of increased pressures across the whole forensic estate, The Orchard Clinic Medium Secure Unit faced the additional challenge of having to close multiple acute admission beds.

This led to challenges in determining how to triage patients in the face of multiple external pressures, frustrations for clinicians managing severely ill patients in prison and human rights concerns for those unfit to stand trial but remanded to custody to await a bed.

The need for an objective tool to aid triage decisions became apparent. We therefore piloted the use of the DUNDRUM triage urgency manual, a structured professional judgement tool to aid triage decisions for forensic units.

The aims of introducing this tool were to ensure decisions are more consistent and reliable, ensure scientifically valid items are not forgotten, make decision making processes more transparent, demonstrate equality of access to services and reduce chance of serious error.

Methods

This audit reviewed all acute admissions to The Orchard Clinic between Aug 22–Aug 23. This covered a period 6 months prior to the introduction of the tool and 6 months after.

In order to determine if the use of the tool improved our triage making decisions the Dundrum score was retrospectively calculated for admissions and those on the waiting list during the first 6 month period of the audit. The same information was recorded for those following the introduction of the tool in the second 6-month period.

Results

Prior to introduction of the DUNDRUM, the team's triage decisions were not in line with validated tools, those with lower DUNDRUM scores were prioritised over those with higher scores. Following introduction of the tool our triage decisions improved. Common themes emerged when we analysed the reasons why our triage decisions were out of line with validated tools. These included patients in hospital settings taking precedence over those in prison, patients admitted without prior discussion at bed management meetings, legal urgency taking precedence over clinical and lack of available HDU space.

Conclusion

Prior to the introduction of the DUNDRUM triage urgency manual the audit demonstrates that the team's triage decisions were not in line with validated tools. This improved following training and use of the tool at bed management meetings. The Orchard Clinic has now formalised use of this tool within bed management meetings. We are currently in the process of re-auditing over a 12-month period.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.