Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:35:06.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Learning Disabilities: Reducing CTPLD West Psychiatry Clinic DNAs by 20% by Offering a More Person-Centred Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Kerenza MacDaid*
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Labib Hussain
Affiliation:
Surrey and Border Partnership NHS Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
Sarah Maber
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Trust, Chertsey, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To explore reasons why patients under the learning disability community psychiatry team were not attending their appointments.

To explore patient preferences for type of appointments offered (F2F, telephone or video) aiming to improve access and attendance, whilst promoting reasonable adjustments for patients with learning disabilities.

To improve efficiency in terms of number of patients seen and reduce wasted clinical and admin time in relation to DNA appointments, by reducing the ‘did not attend’ (DNA) rates by 20%.

Methods

With the support of the QI team using methodology including fishbone diagrams and PDSA cycles, electronic data on the number of DNA psychiatry appointments were collated from January 2022 onwards and recorded monthly.

Each DNA appointment was coded with a reason given for non-attendance. The data was then reviewed and analysed to identify any common themes around non-attendance.

A questionnaire was initially trialled with a small sample of patients who had not attended to explore reasons for non-attendance and preference regarding appointment type. The questionnaire was then sent to all CTPLDW patients who had missed appointments. An easy-read version was also sent to promote accessibility amongst the patient group. The data was collated and reviewed.

Results

Most common reasons for patients not attending their psychiatry outpatient clinic appointments under the CTPLDW team were identified:

2022: 35 patients DNA – 28.6% citing communication/correspondence issues.

2023: 30 patients DNA – 33.3% citing communication/correspondence issues.

Additional reasons for non-attendance included issues with residential homes, sickness and transport.

Conclusion

An anecdotally high number of DNAs were noted by CTPLDW. The data collected thus far has helped us to define and understand the issues. The main factors identified revolve around communication and correspondence of appointment times.

The next step in our quality improvement project is to trial text reminders for patients and carers to assist in remembering appointments, to assess whether this change idea helps to decrease the number of DNAs.

Future change ideas include development of resources to support attendance (e.g. adjusted appointment letters with QR codes for access/maps, reminder letters in easy-read format and video tours).

CTPLDW would like to offer a more personalised approach with a service that promotes reasonable adjustments and reduces barriers to access, thereby reducing the number of DNA appointments.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.