Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:34:46.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linguistic Creativity and Formal Thought Disorder in Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Louise Robinson*
Affiliation:
Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Dawn Archer
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
Alex Bartha
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, East London, United Kingdom
Gerasimos Chatzidamianos
Affiliation:
Amercian College of Greece, Greece
Oliver Delgaram-Nejad
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The present investigation was interested in whether formal thought disorder (FTD) in schizophrenia was in any way related to linguistic creativity. The project's main aims and research questions were the development of operational definitions of linguistic creativity and FTD in schizophrenia, an investigation of creative language processing in schizophrenia, and an investigation of creative language output in schizophrenia.

Methods

We designed a psycholinguistic experiment and collected natural language data to build a specialised schizophrenia corpus. Recruitment for the psycholinguist experiment was challenged by the COVID pandemic and the technical abilities of clinical participants. Those data are thus underpowered and not reported in the results. We collected sufficient data for the construction of the specialised corpus.

Results

We tested an operational definition of FTD in schizophrenia (the '4TD Framework') against our natural language dataset. There was good support for the framework, with grammatical and discourse tracking features reliably distinguishing clinical and comparison speakers (p < 0.05). We also examined concordance lines and grouped random concordances into error types. Error types were consistently similar across groups, suggesting that speech disturbances in schizophrenia are on a continuum with those of nonclinical speakers. We also conducted a keyness analysis to examine the key terms and semantic categories present in the corpus and noted significant differences in the clinical cohort. Clinical participants found discussion of the topic of linguistic creativity more challenging, deviating from topic more often. They also involved topics of emotional and personal concern at rates of up to 16 to 32 times more often than comparison participants in some cases.

Conclusion

Our results provide support for the dysexecutive and dyssemantic hypotheses of FTD, as well as work on the Thought Language Index (TLI) that also suggests that language disturbances in schizophrenia and FTD are on a continuum with nonclinical speech. Further research is needed to understand how these phenomena are positioned in relation to FTD as a transdiagnostic entity.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.