Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:34:15.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Novel Model for Student-Led Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Training at a UK Medical School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Isabelle Gallier-Birt*
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
Emily Róisín Reid
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
George Webster
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
Mary Bowley
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

It was identified that at Warwick Medical School (WMS) there was no provision for in-person, student-led Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (J, E, D&I) training for both staff and students. A novel approach using case-based studies and group discussions was developed through a student-staff collaboration with the aim of participants gaining a greater understanding of the impact of various institutional practices, from the perspective of students with first-hand experience of the subject matter. The training aimed to promote a greater understanding of intersectionality, and how institutional practices can disproportionately disadvantage students depending on their identity, experience, and background. Participants were encouraged to reflect upon the cumulative effects of systemic disadvantages in higher and medical education. The subsequent impact upon academic attainment, mental health and wellbeing was a further focus.

Methods

Around 350 students and staff from across WMS attended the training sessions over 6 months. These sessions were led by a team of student facilitators who possessed subject expertise in topics related to J, E, D&I, in addition to representing the communities that were discussed in terms of inclusion. The content was delivered in the form of case-based scenarios and small and wider group discussions. Content was based on discussions surrounding racism, classism, ableism, homophobia, sexism, Islamophobia, and transphobia. Discussion was encouraged and facilitated to promote reflection on personal practices and acknowledgement of where future efforts to improve practice should be directed.

Results

Results indicate statistically significant shifts in participant knowledge and confidence levels in pre-post survey data, with qualitative feedback emphasising the strength of the student-led format. Faculty and students commented on the benefit of student-lead case-based teaching and student facilitator reflections highlight personal growth and the challenges of navigating power dynamics.

Conclusion

Overall, this project illustrates the efficacy of a student-led change initiative in fostering inclusivity and positive change within educational environments and provides an original model to explore for future partnership-working across the medical school. The student-led approach facilitated mutual learning between staff and students, bringing greater focus to how student attainment and wellbeing can be impacted by institutional practices.

Type
2 Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.