Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:34:12.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prescribing Practice of Citalopram and Escitalopram in Older Adults Following the 2014 MHRA Guidance of Associated QTc Prolongation: A Clinical Audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Shreyan Kar*
Affiliation:
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
Aparna Prasanna
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Citalopram and escitalopram are commonly used serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of depression and anxiety. These medications are known to cause corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation, with risks of further arrhythmias. In 2014, the Medicines Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) published guidance outlining this risk and advised decreased maximum daily doses of citalopram 20mg and escitalopram 10mg in the elderly population. The aim of this audit was to explore the prescribing patterns of citalopram and escitalopram in a community sample of older adults with psychiatric disorders, against MHRA guidance.

Methods

Older adults (aged >65 years) in the community mental health services in Wolverhampton, who were prescribed citalopram or escitalopram, were identified through a search of clinic letters in June 2023. We checked the medications, doses, history of QTc prolongation, concurrent medications that may prolong QTc, electrocardiogram (ECG) reviews, and any discussion about the risk. The data was collected by accessing the electronic patient record and related health records. In total 17 patients were included, with no exclusions.

Results

Most of the patients (94.1%, n = 16) were on citalopram and only one patient was on escitalopram. The most common dose of citalopram was 20 mg (62.5%, 10/16), with one patient having a higher than the recommended dose (30 mg). Escitalopram was within the recommended dose. There was no history of QTc prolongation in any patient. Concurrent medications that could prolong QTc were identified in 35.3% (n = 6) of the patient population; all of these were antipsychotics. A small proportion (11.8%, n = 2) of the patients had documentation stating about QTc prolongation and arrhythmia risks for citalopram or escitalopram. A review of ECG when initiating or adjusting treatment was noted in only one patient.

Conclusion

Most of the older adults had citalopram and escitalopram within recommended limits. A considerable proportion of patients had concurrent medications with an additional risk of prolonging QTc and subsequent arrhythmia. It is essential to consider ECG in all elderly patients before starting medications with a risk of QTc prolongation. There is a need to discuss the cardiac risk associated with citalopram and escitalopram with the patients and improve documentation. It may be better to provide written information to the patients and caregivers regarding this.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.