Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:33:28.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Distress and Suicidal Ideation in Low- and Lower Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Usman Arshad
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Mueen Abid
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan
Imran Chaudhry*
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Nasim Chaudhry
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Nusrat Husain
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted healthcare systems, economies, and global health, raising concerns about its potential effects on mental health. A recent systematic review found a 40% prevalence of poor sleep quality, with 34%, 26%, and 27% prevalence for psychological distress, depression, and anxiety. The systematic review investigated COVID-19-related stress, suicidal ideation, and self-harm thoughts among low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs).

Methods

We search four electronic databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Embase, and PubMed). Quantitative studies, including both published and grey literature, from LLMICs focused on the prevalence of suicidal ideation or psychological distress during COVID-19 were included. Qualitative studies, non-English studies without full-text English translation, meta-analysis, commentary, books, and discussion articles were excluded.

Results

1157 titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion and exclusion, resulting in 79 full-text articles. After full text screening, 11 articles were included. In Bangladesh, 12.8% of university students reported suicidal ideation (SI), while 19% of young adults had SI, and 18.5% reported suicidal planning. In addition to this, in Iran, 12.8% of pregnant women and in the Philippines, 24.9% of the general population reported SI. Mental health conditions like depression and anxiety, female gender, younger age groups, economic loss or financial stress, fear of COVID-19 infection, lack of social support, family problems, lower education levels, smoking, and substance use are identified as risk factors. Moreover, anosmia and dysgeusia symptoms were associated with a 30–80% increased risk of transitioning to suicidal ideation or depression in India. A study from Nepal reported a 44% increase in suicide attempts during lockdown compared with pre-pandemic periods in Nepal.

Conclusion

The findings of this review suggest that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in LLMICs is substantial. In addition to the increased risk of SI and suicide attempts, there was a significant rise in depression and SI associated with anosmia and dysgeusia symptoms. These results underscore the urgent need for increased psychosocial support in LLMICs to address the growing mental health burden caused by the pandemic. Moreover, understanding the long-term effects of the pandemic is crucial for developing effective interventions and support systems. Further research is needed to examine the lasting impact of the pandemic on mental well-being and identify future strategies.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.