Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:35:37.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality of Adult Inpatient Discharge Planning and 3 Day Follow Up – a Regional Audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Tajnin Mitu
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
Anita Pierce
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Rhyl, United Kingdom
Nehad Seddiq
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, United Kingdom
Asmaa Elsayed
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
Ishraq Elahi*
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

This study aimed to assess the post-discharge follow-up processes for psychiatric patients, specifically focusing on a 72-hour follow-up with documented Mental State Examination (MSE) and the presence of a comprehensive care plan, including up-to-date risk assessments and handover documentation.

Methods

Conducted across three psychiatric units – Heddfan, Ablett, and Hergest – and associated Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) sites within Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, the audit spanned eight weeks (14/08/2023 to 16/10/2023). Adhering to NICE guidelines (NG-53) and CCQI Standards for Community-Based Mental Health Services-2017, data collection focused on the specified criteria.

Results

Analysis revealed that 23% of patients did not receive a 72-hour follow-up post-discharge, attributed to reasons such as patient refusal or missed appointments. Only 74% of patients had documented risk assessments, posing challenges to follow-up teams. Despite the hospital's controlled environment, transitioning patients into the community demands updated risk assessments. While 87% of patients had documented mental state examinations during follow-ups, there's room for improvement in this crucial activity.

Conclusion

In summary, the study emphasizes the importance of meticulous documentation and communication in the transition from inpatient psychiatric care to community settings. Challenges in achieving comprehensive follow-up documentation, with only 67% meeting criteria, were identified. The presence of an online Medication Therapy and Electronic Discharge system faced obstacles in printout availability. Designating a responsible individual for care plans pre-discharge and commendable adherence to thorough assessments during inpatient stays (83%) underscore efforts for a holistic approach. Future enhancements should target improving medication information integration and fortifying collaboration between inpatient and community teams. Addressing these aspects not only prevents medication-related errors but also ensures a seamless and patient-focused transition, enhancing the overall quality of mental health care delivery.

Additional Authors: Dr Minahil Junaid, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Rhyl; Dr Moheet Rahal, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Rhyl; Dr Aanika Nawr Hoque, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham; Raghdah Faisal, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, Amin Rezk, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham; Mostafa Negm, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.