Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T00:49:56.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reducing Emergency Prescriptions (FP10s) Requiring Electronic Shared Care Agreement (ESCA) by North Hub Community Mental Health Team (CMHT), Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Alisha Bakshi*
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Zora Bell
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Matthew Stafford
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Kate Jennings-Cole
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Sanna Ceesay
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The community mental health team (CMHT) is actively involved in reviewing mental health patients who require commencing psychotropic medications. The responsibility to prescribe the psychotropic medications falls on the CMHT for the first 3 months. After this period, if the patient's mental health is stable, the prescribing role can be transferred to the GP by completion of an electronic shared care agreement (ESCA).

This project aimed to improve the management of emergency prescriptions (FP10s) requiring ESCA within the North Hub CMHT, BSMHFT focussing on reducing administrative time in receiving numerous urgent phone calls for repeat prescriptions, timely completion of ESCA and updating the electronic prescribing system.

Methods

Data collection was done by logging the numbers of the following on a weekly basis:

  1. 1. FP10s issued.

  2. 2. Calls related to FP10s.

  3. 3. ESCA sent.

Baseline data was collected over 11 weeks to analyse practice. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle was used to improve the processes from January to August 2023. Identified PDSA cycles included:
  1. 1. Clinician prompt reminders to check ESCA status.

  2. 2. Document FP10s instances on issue and inform patient about ESCA during outpatient appointments.

  3. 3. A 4-week system for managing FP10s at reception desk.

  4. 4. Increase consistent use of and access to EPMA.

Data was collected again for 4 weeks in December 2023 to assess sustainability of the implemented changes.

Results

This project resulted in a 14% reduction in the number of FP10s requiring ESCA and a 27% reduction in the number of calls for FP10s from January to August 2023. Data measuring sustainability in December 2023 showed a total reduction of 64% from the baseline of 28 FP10s per week at the beginning of the project (January 2023) to an average of 10 FP10s issued per week in December 2023.

Conclusion

In conclusion, patients benefit from having a clear understanding of where their medications will be issued from thus improving their experience with the mental health service. Having effective processes in the CMHT enables medical professionals to complete the ESCA in a timely manner. Altogether this reduces burden on all professionals and reduces costs of prescribing by transferring the prescribing responsibilities to GPs. This project has been effective in reducing the number of weekly emergency FP10s issued. The 4-week system of managing FP10s at reception has now been included in the Medication Management's new procedure and guidance and is being introduced across all CMHTs in BSMHFT.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.