Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:15:48.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk Factors for Self-Harm and Suicide Upon Release From Prison: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Nouran Abdou*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Louise Robinson
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire and South Cumbria, United Kingdom
Kerry Gutridge
Affiliation:
Centre for Women's Mental Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

As of 2018, there were over 11 million people imprisoned globally. Suicide and self-harm rates have been found to be markedly elevated among imprisoned individuals, however there is much less literature reporting on risk factors for suicide and self-harm following prison release. The immediate post-release period has been found to be a particularly high-risk period for suicide and self-harm. Since many more people are released into the community every year than people kept imprisoned, released prisoners' health is a matter of public health concern. With the societal impact of this topic in mind, this systematic review aims to collate the risk factors for suicide and self-harm upon release from prison.

Methods

PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were systematically searched using keywords relating to prison release, self-harm and suicide for articles published since 1/1/12. Studies were included if they reported data on risk factors for self-harm or suicide and followed prespecified inclusion criteria. Articles were screened by the author and uncertainty was settled by two independent reviewers. Included studies were evaluated using standardised quality assessment tools. Quantitative data were narratively synthesised due to a high level of heterogeneity in between studies.

Results

248 articles were identified in total. 10 articles were included, reporting data on self-harm and suicide risk factors from 5 countries. Studies ranged from moderate (n = 2) to high quality (n = 8). Risk factors were categorised into the following: demographic characteristics, psychiatric history, conviction type, and imprisonment history. Risk factors which did not fit into any of these categories were categorised into an ”other” group. It was found that there were many non-modifiable factors such as violent convictions, female sex, Indigenous (Torres Strait Islander or Aboriginal) ethnicity, and single relationship status which increase self-harm or suicide risk upon release.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to collate the risk factors for suicide and self-harm following prison release. The results show a complex variety of risk factors. The high mortality rate in this group necessitates the need for strategies to intervene before community re-entry. Study into risk factors post-release may guide identification of at-risk groups to target with proactive, coordinated care pre- and post-release. It is likely this will require a multifactorial approach including health, social and community programmes.

Type
Rapid-Fire Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

The submitted abstracts from posters presented at the RCPsych International Congress 2023, 10–13 July are published as a special supplement to BJPsych Open.

Disclaimer

The abstracts have been published using author-supplied copy, with only minor editing made to correct spelling, style and format where appropriate. No responsibility is assumed for any claims, instruction or methods contained in the abstracts and it is recommended that these be verified independently. Unless so stated, material in this supplement does not necessarily reflect the views of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, RCPsych Academic Faculty or Editor-in-Chief. The publishers are not responsible for any error of omission or fact.

Selected from the top scoring abstracts from all categories. Arranged by presenting author surname.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.