Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-76l5x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T03:27:32.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Trust Wide Audit Evaluating Prescribing Practices in Clients With Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (EUPD)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Tarun Rangan*
Affiliation:
South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Monisha Mishra
Affiliation:
South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Taimoor Jaura
Affiliation:
South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Camille Wratten
Affiliation:
South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Andrew White
Affiliation:
South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The aim of this audit was to evaluate prescribing practices in patients with EUPD at South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust and compare these to NICE guidance on the management of EUPD. We are aware that for a multitude of reasons including high levels of distress and long waiting times for psychological therapy, clients with EUPD are often prescribed psychotropic medication. NICE guidance states that drug treatment including antipsychotics should not be used specifically for EUPD or for associated behavioural symptoms. Drug treatment for comorbid conditions and short-term use of sedative medication may be considered as part of a crisis treatment plan. If prescribing, NICE recommends that written material be provided to the client along with regular treatment reviews.

Methods

We obtained a list of patients in the trust with a recorded diagnosis of EUPD on their electronic patient record (EPR) system (N=869). 10% of these clients were randomly sampled (N=87).

The notes were assessed for any prescribed psychiatric medication including the documented rationale for prescribing. We also assessed if medication use was consistent with NICE recommended time limited crisis prescribing and whether there was evidence of regular reviews of prescribed medication and of written material being provided to the client.

Results

Of the sampled clients, 81.6% (n=71) were prescribed medication. Of these, 39.4%( n=28) had medication use consistent with NICE recommended time limited prescribing, and 57.7%( n=41) had timely reviews of medication. 4.2% (n=3) of those prescribed medication had evidence on their EPR of written material being provided.

Conclusion

Our results highlight the extent of drug prescribing for EUPD within the trust. Over half of patients sampled had timely reviews of prescribed medication. However, most were not consistent with NICE recommended time limited prescribing. The results were presented to the trust's Clinical Reference Group. A Working Group has now been formed to help bring prescribing practices better in line with NICE guidance, specifically around the provision and recording of written information of drug treatment to patients and reducing inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.