Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:33:30.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Is the Evidence for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBTI) in Improving Sleep in People With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Charlotte Forbes*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
Jo Butterworth
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
Chris Fox
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
Louise Allan
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

There is a well-established association between sleep disturbance and cognitive decline. Poor sleep can have a significant effect on patient and carer wellbeing and is a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia. Sleep medications are problematic in cognitive impairment due to the increased risk of adverse events such as falls and confusion. There is good evidence for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBTI) in older adults but its effectiveness in cognitive impairment is unclear. In 2021, only one RCT on CBTI in cognitive impairment was identified (Cassidy-Eagle et al. 2018). This review seeks to establish if there is any new evidence.

Methods

Ovid Medline (1946 to present) and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for all interventional trials testing CBTI including RCTs, single-arm studies and protocols, written in English. Inclusion criteria:

  1. 1. Adults with a diagnosis of MCI or Alzheimer's dementia;

  2. 2. Sleep as a primary outcome, using a validated outcome measure.

Systematic reviews were tracked for references.

Results

172 citations were screened by the first author and 26 underwent full text review. Eight papers were eligible for inclusion. Four of these studied MCI, three looked at people living with dementia (PLWD) and caregivers as a dyad and one combined MCI and Alzheimer's (protocol only).

The search found two pilot RCTs and two protocols for MCI. Cassidy-Eagle et al. (2018) found a highly significant positive effect on four of five sleep outcome measures with large effect sizes. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) decreased from 15.29 to 3.25 (p < 0.001; Cohen's d −4.22). Mattos et al. (2021) also found significant improvements on all sleep outcome measures; ISI decreased from 13.5 to 8.3 (p < 0.01).

Three papers study joint CBTI for PLWD and their care partners (one pilot RCT and two protocols). Song et al. (2024) reported improvements in sleep parameters for both participants in the dyad but were not statistically significant. They are recruiting for a larger trial.

Conclusion

This review identified 7 new RCTs in progress. In MCI, new data continue to show a significant association between CBTI and improved sleep. Published data for people with dementia have not found a significant relationship, although the data set remains very limited. It is not yet possible to synthesise the results and future systematic reviews are needed. If effective, CBTI could offer a lower risk alternative to medications in managing sleep disturbance in people with cognitive impairment.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.