Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:34:45.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

White Matter Microstructure Abnormalities in Individuals at High Risk for Psychosis: A Meta-Analysis of Fractional Anisotropic Changes Associated With Transition to Psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Chukwuma Ntephe*
Affiliation:
University College London, London, United Kingdom South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Dhwani Desai
Affiliation:
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Pedro Laguna
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Anthony David
Affiliation:
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Kate Merritt
Affiliation:
University College London, London, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Recent studies have focussed on detecting white matter abnormalities in subjects who transition to psychosis (UHR-T). Research suggests that fractional anisotropy (FA), may be decreased in UHR-T. However, global and regional findings have been inconsistent. By objectively combining data in a meta-analysis, we have investigated white matter alterations associated with transition, by comparing FA in UHR-T with subjects that do not transition (UHR-NT) and healthy volunteers.

Methods

The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021265348) and followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA guidance. A systematic database search of PUBMED and EMBASE identified reports, which were screened by 2 independent researchers (CN and DD) for inclusion, from inception to 20 July 2021. Discrepancies were decided on consensus with a third researcher (KM). Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Authors of screened reports were contacted to provide parametric maps. Coordinate-based meta-analysis was conducted using Seed-based d-Mapping software to combine parametric map and coordinate data from reports, using a random-effects model. Quality and risk of bias analysis were conducted using the Newcastle-Ottowa Scale. Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

Results

The search strategy identified 889 potential studies, from which 6 met eligibility criteria. A total of 71 UHR-T, 142 UHR-NT and 148 healthy volunteers were included. Weighted-mean decreases in FA were observed in UHR-T compared with: UHR-NT (d = −0.99; p < 0.0001; 95% CI −1.43 to −0.55); and healthy volunteers (d = −0.91; p = 0.04; 95% CI −1.78 to −0.05). The level of heterogeneity for the former was not significant. For UHR-T, regional FA decreases were observed in areas including the left genu of the corpus callosum (Z-score = −1.76, 204 voxels, p < 0.0001) compared with UHR-NT, while FA increases were most observed in the white matter region adjacent to the left postcentral gyrus (Z-score = 1.64, voxels = 16, p < 0.0001). These findings persisted despite sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that white matter alterations, specifically in left frontotemporal tracts, are associated with an increased risk of transition to psychosis. The neurobiological implications of these findings, and their contribution to UHR-T prediction efforts, are explored, as are avenues for further research.

Additional Author: Mr Gunnar Gronlid.1

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.